Dear Colleagues
 
Amidst this debate you may be interested to know that the Government has released a draft of its proposed Cultural Property (Armed Conflict) Bill which ratifies the 1954 Hague Convention on the protection of cultural property in time of armed conflict.  The NCA has commented on the Bill and offered its expertise as a source of practical help in such situations.  Colleagues may wish to view the draft and perhaps send in their comments either to the DCMS  (http://www.commonsleader.gov.uk/OutPut/Page1785.asp) or the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee, which has requested comments by 17 March (http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/culture__media_and_sport/cms080131.cfm).
 
With regards
 
Elizabeth Oxborrow-Cowan
Director of Publicity and Communication
The National Council on Archives
www.ncaonline.org.uk

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Michael Cook <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
It's a pity we have had some petty-minded responses from colleagues about the high-handed way the Americans have dealt with Iraqi archives.

here is information about the organization that signed the agreement with the Hoover Institute

http://www.iraqmemory.org/EN/

"According to the terms of the deal, Hoover has agreed to hold the records for the foundation for the next five years. At the end of that period, the two parties will examine the possibility of repatriating the documents to Iraq."
https://www.stanford.edu/group/ic/cgi-bin/drupal/node/387

here is the link to the Hoover Institution
http://www.hoover.org/hila

"It is essential that these documents be back among the Iraqi people," Kanan Makiya, founder of the Iraq Memory Foundation and an Iraqi-born professor of Middle East studies at Brandeis University, said in a recent interview with The Chronicle. "But," he added, "Baghdad is just not ready for it."

Richard Sousa, a senior associate director at the Hoover Institution, said the California library had received several pieces of correspondence between the Iraqi state and the Memory Foundation which showed that "this is something the government wanted them to do—to save [the documents] and hold them as a service to the government."

http://chronicle.com/free/2008/01/1335n.htm

Baghdad is just too dangerous for the documents, Mr. Makiya says — and not only that, the documents may be too dangerous for Baghdad.
http://chronicle.com/temp/reprint.php?id=m15z17nkvd9t3mb522xcfdpqjb97y87k



--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va