 |
 |
Dear all, Innovative later drew our attention to the following part of the manual: The Millennium Manual page 105116 details the settings you need to correctly send multi-location orders - specifically, you need to set the GIR CODE field in the Vendor record to the correct value: 1. Enter one of the following values in the GIR CODE field to specify which information is included in the GIR segment of the order. Value Data Sent Comments 0 no GIR (default) 1 GIR, no address Used to send location and fund details for each copy in a multi-copy order 2 GIR with address Used to send multiple SEND-TO addresses if the library wants to receive copies from a single order at multiple locations. 3 GIR with call number, no address Used to send the call number to facilitate ordering materials that are shelf-ready upon receipt. 4 GIR with call number and address Used to send both the call number and multiple SEND-TO addresses. so with the GIR set to '1' multi-location orders should transmit correctly, if this does not work for you, then please get a call open with Help Desk to investigate! We're currently testing this with our suppliers... Beverley Beverley Hughes Head of Acquisitions and Metadata Support Collections and Research Support, Academic Services Main Library University of Exeter Stocker Road Exeter EX4 4PT UK t 01392 263864 f 01392 263871 e [log in to unmask] Times Higher University of the Year 2007-08 ________________________________ From: This list is for current and potential users of the Innopac system [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of O'Leary, Simon Sent: 20 February 2008 08:52 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Edifact question re multi location Catherine, Beverley, We use the 'VEN NOTE' field to transmit our required shelf mark (if necessary) and for each location of a multi order. We put the number of copies in brackets after each separate location. Not ideal I know but seems to work fine with all vendors. Regards, Simon ________________________________ From: This list is for current and potential users of the Innopac system [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Hughes, Beverley Sent: 19 February 2008 12:06 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Edifact question re multi location Catherine, we send separate orders for each location with EDI orders, as we found our suppliers weren't getting the correct information, and didn't have time to explore it fully... If you do hear of a work round, I'd be interested if you could pass it on, Beverley Beverley Hughes Head of Acquisitions and Metadata Support Collections and Research Support, Academic Services Main Library University of Exeter Stocker Road Exeter EX4 4PT UK t 01392 263864 f 01392 263871 e [log in to unmask] Times Higher University of the Year 2007-08 ________________________________ From: This list is for current and potential users of the Innopac system [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Catherine O'Sullivan Sent: 19 February 2008 11:55 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Edifact question re multi location We seem to be having problems with the location 'multi' not transmitting as separate GIR lines to Dawsons indicating the number of copies for each location. Is this a general problem or is it just something here? Thanks Catherine Catherine O'Sullivan Systems & Bibliographic Services Manager St Mary's University College Waldegrave Road Strawberry Hill TWICKENHAM TW1 4SX Tel: 020 8240 4303 Fax: 020 8240 4270