Print

Print


Thanks for all help, and quick answers.


Hallvard Røe Evensmoen


Siterer Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>:

> Use the ApplyXFM GUI - select your mask as the input, and the 1mm
> standard brain as the output - click "Use identity transformation" and
> name the output whatever you like.
>
> Cheers
>
> T
>
>
>
> On 15 Feb 2008, at 16:56, Hallvard Røe Evensmoen wrote:
>
>> That was a good suggestion. I just found out that it was the case.   
>> How would you have transformed the mask into a 1mm resolution?
>>
>> Siterer Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>:
>>
>>> Hi Hallvard -
>>> Can we just check that you are sure you used this standard image when
>>> you ran the 1st level analyses.
>>> For example, you didn't select the 1mm standard brain by mistake?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> T
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15 Feb 2008, at 13:52, Hallvard Røe Evensmoen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for quick answear. I don`t know. The data for the standard  
>>>>   space image and the self-made mask are here:
>>>> pintzka@linux-sopg:/media/ubuntu/Navigasjon/ROI_masks> fslinfo    
>>>> MNI152_T1_2mm_brain
>>>> data_type      INT16
>>>> dim1           91
>>>> dim2           109
>>>> dim3           91
>>>> dim4           1
>>>> datatype       4
>>>> pixdim1        2.0000000000
>>>> pixdim2        2.0000000000
>>>> pixdim3        2.0000000000
>>>> pixdim4        1.0000000000
>>>> cal_max        8000.0000
>>>> cal_min        3000.0000
>>>> file_type      NIFTI-1+
>>>> pintzka@linux-sopg:/media/ubuntu/Navigasjon/ROI_masks> fslinfo    
>>>> MTL-mask_square2_bilateral
>>>> data_type      INT16
>>>> dim1           91
>>>> dim2           109
>>>> dim3           91
>>>> dim4           1
>>>> datatype       4
>>>> pixdim1        2.0000000000
>>>> pixdim2        2.0000000000
>>>> pixdim3        2.0000000000
>>>> pixdim4        0.0000000000
>>>> cal_max        1.0000
>>>> cal_min        0.0000
>>>> file_type      NIFTI-1+
>>>>
>>>> Siterer Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>:
>>>>
>>>>> Sounds to me as if your self-made mask was not the same size as the
>>>>> standard space image you are using.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your results will be in this space, and therefore so should your mask be.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>
>>>>> T
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 15 Feb 2008, at 13:26, Hallvard Røe Evensmoen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> When trying to use a self-made binary MTL mask on a third level
>>>>>> analysis in FSL, we got this error message:
>>>>>> /usr/local/fsl/bin/fslmaths thresh_zstat1 -mas
>>>>>> /media/ubuntu/Navigasjon/ROI_masks/MTL-mask_square2_bilateral.nii.gz
>>>>>> thresh_zstat1
>>>>>> Image Exception : #3 :: Attempted to multiply images/ROIs of    
>>>>>> different sizes
>>>>>> terminate called after throwing an instance of   
>>>>>> 'RBD_COMMON::BaseException'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And the output were as if we not had used any mask at all....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone got any suggestions about what might have gone wrong?, and we
>>>>>> would be grateful to hear.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hallvard Røe Evensmoen
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>