Print

Print


Call for papers: RGS-IBG Annual International Conference, 27-29th August 2008, London

 

Title: “Youth Matters? Critical geographies of youth policy and practice”

 

Convenors:    Peter Kraftl (Department of Geography, University of Leicester, UK)

John Horton (Centre for Children & Youth, The University of Northampton, UK)

Faith Tucker (Centre for Children & Youth, The University of Northampton, UK)

 

 

Research group affiliation: Geographies of Children, Youth and Families Working Group

 

Abstract:

 

As part of an engagement with policy literatures and professional practices (e.g. public service provision) ‘outside’ the academy, a growing number of geographers have sought to adopt more critical stances to governmental discourses (Martin, 2001). For instance, (post-)medical geographers have performed critical readings of mental health (Parr, 2004) and obesity (Evans, 2006) policy-making in the UK and elsewhere. Geographers of childhood and youth have – similarly – sought to engage critically with policy-making for young people, often with particular interest in children’s participation in the production of governmental knowledge (e.g. special issue of Children’s Geographies journal, 2006). Yet geographers have not – thus far – explored the full range of social constructions, representations, viewpoints, practices and (often emotive) debates that are incorporated in policy and professional practices targeted at young people. In particular, four issues might benefit from critical, geographical analysis.

 

First, there is a pressing need to understand the spatial implications of the contexts and the contents of recent policy documents aimed specifically at young people (e.g. in the UK, Youth Matters). Second, geographers might extend their critical analyses to explore the treatment of young people in more general pieces of legislation (e.g. on health, employment, education or crime). Third, there is a need to understand the complex and recursive relationship between (inter)national policy-making on one hand, and regional/local interpretations on the other (e.g. in the UK, the recent introduction of Children’s Trusts). In particular – with nuanced conceptualisations of scale – geographers could unpick the interpretation, negotiation and implementation of youth policy legislation at different spatial scales. Fourth, geographers could attend to the sheer diversity of ways in which ‘policy’ and ‘professional practice’ with young people are performed – acknowledging and interrogating the sheer work involved in meetings, consultations, training, providing services ‘on the ground’, to/with young people and their families.

 

We welcome abstracts for 20-minute papers which critically analyse the geographies of youth policy and professional practice within any geographical context. Papers may attend to any of the following issues, or any geographical slant on the documentation, representation and performance of youth policies.

 

  • Representations and social constructions of young people in youth policies, and policy interventions more generally.
  • The types of knowledges, emotions and moralities evident in youth policies.
  • The relationship between policy documents, professional practices and other representations of young people (e.g. the mass media).
  • The diverse ways in which youth has come to ‘matter’ in global/national/local policy-making since the UN declaration on the rights of the child.
  • The implications of policy discourse and professional practice for emergent ‘inter-generational’ geographies of age (e.g. Hopkins and Pain, 2007).
  • The processes and practices involved in interpreting (inter)national youth policies at local scales.
  • The everyday practices, materials and emotions that constitute professional practice and work with young people (e.g. Kraftl and Horton, 2007); e.g. meetings, consultations, training, and the provision services ‘on the ground’, to/with young people and their families.
  • Young people’s views and experiences of recent youth policies and professional practice (i.e. of ‘service provision’).
  • Young people’s ‘place’ in the production and contestation of youth policies and professional practices.
  • The role of academic geography in contributing to, and contesting, youth policies

 

 

Abstracts for proposed papers (max. 250 words) should be submitted to Peter Kraftl ([log in to unmask]) before 31st January 2008.