May I suggest that the figure will depend
upon the nature of the organisation, what it does and the associated health
risks? I can think of organisations that are our clients where 1:1000 would not
be sufficient due to the nature of the operation and the potential for problems
and others where this relationship would be more than adequate. When considering
the employee number do we include office workers, etc. or just those in the
actual factory, those at high risk, those handling chemicals, and what about the
sales team out on the road? I don't think that there is one simple answer to
this question.
Another problem is if we set the ratio
at 1:1000, what about organisations with fewer than 1000 employees? I have one
client where the assessment was such that management decided they needed two
OCNs for a workforce of 250 and another with around 750 with just one part time
OHN. In both cases my view is that they are more or less correct.
I would be concerned, therefore, if we set a
figure, that this will become a "gold standard" that may or may not be
appropriate for any given organisation.
Chris
EnviroDerm Services U.K. Ltd.
2 Amery
Lodge Farm, North Littleton, Evesham, WR11 8QY, U.K.
Tel: 0044 1386 832
311
Dermatological Engineering for a healthier workplace
For more
information about our support, services and technical aids, visit our recently
revised website: (www.enviroderm.co.uk)
For immediate
help e-mail us at [log in to unmask] or phone on +44
1386 832 311
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please remove this footer before replying.
OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
FORTHCOMING CONFERENCES AND EDUCATIONAL EVENTS:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH JOBS
http://OHJobs.drmaze.net
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH NURSING EDUCATION
http://www.aohne.org.uk