Print

Print


Actually, it's not book keeping, it's simple courtesy -- and not only on 
a BB:  an attachment is lazy, and a large attachment is downright rude. 

I am routinely stuck with a slow connection (travelling), and others are 
*permanently* stuck with one.  So please be nice... ;)

phx.



Anastassis Perrakis wrote:
> Dear all -
>
> Sorry to intervene on a 'book keeping' issue, but indeed over the last 
> few months an increasing number of people (Jerry is not the first, so 
> Jerry please do not take it personally) attach pictures etc. I think 
> in a bb standard practice dictates to only use text - if illustrations 
> are needed to explain the problem, you can put them in eg a web site.
>
> Some text like that was in the 'code of conduct' off ccp4bb in the 
> past, but I could no longer find it.
>
> Thus apologies if I am wrong and policies have changed, but maybe the 
> ccp4 crowd could tell us what is the suggested policy.
>
> And, if you really want to send an image please do bother to make it 
> small. The initial posting had a 630k image, which it took me 1 min to 
> make 20k and it still makes the point (attached so I can also violate 
> the rules i am suggesting - I love inconsistency).
>
> Thanks, Tassos
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2008, at 20:11, Jerry McCully wrote:
>
>>
>> Dear All:
>>
>>       Thanks a lot for the prompt reply on this topic of salt 
>> sensitive complex.
>>
>>       Attached please find one ITC final figure done under 25mM 
>> Tris(pH8.0), 60mM NaCl.
>>
>>       As mentioned before, the ionization of Tris will interfere with 
>> the ITC experiments.
>>
>>      Therefore I am sure of my binding results.
>>
>>       Can anyone give me some comments on this ITC experiment? 
>> Basically do these two proteins bind to each other? If so, how should 
>> I improve the ITC experiments to get a similar affinity shown by 
>> BIAcore(about 0.5uM)?
>>
>>     Thanks again.
>>
>> Jerry
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>     Hi Jerry,
>>      
>>     Tris can cause problems, you are better off using something like
>>     HEPES, and HEPES should be ok at pH 8. (Buffers with an
>>     ethane-sulphonic acid group tend to be the best - those ending in
>>     'ES', so MES, TES and HEPES)
>>      
>>     FYI, the error on your K is bigger than the actual measurement -
>>     1.49x10^5 ± 1.5x10^5.
>>     Signal to noise to is probably your enemy, which is making the curve
>>     fitting difficult. Changing buffer may help this - there may be some
>>     non-specific component to what you're seeing  - increasing salt a bit
>>     or dropping in something like 5% glycerol may help with this.
>>      
>>     Would you be able to post a jpeg/pdf of the curve?
>>      
>>     Regards,
>>      
>>     David
>>      
>>      
>>     On 25/01/2008, Jerry McCully  wrote:
>>     >
>>     >  Dear All:
>>     >
>>     >        Firstly  I would like to thank many folks here for giving me great
>>     > ideas several days ago.
>>     >
>>     >       The following are some updates for this question.
>>     >
>>     >      I did ITC experiments again using 25mMTris(pH8), 60mM NaCl(low salt
>>     > condition).
>>     >
>>     >     But things still turn out to be a little weird.
>>     >
>>     >     I increased the concentration of both proteins(60uM in the cell and
>>     > 1200uM in the syringe). At the end of the ITC, I saw a little of
>>     > precipitation of both the proteins.
>>     >
>>     >     Fortunately I can roughly fit the curve this time. However, the heat was
>>     > still low, around 1Kcal/mole of per injectant.  I am not sure about the
>>     > fitting statistics.
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > N         1.10     ±0.17
>>     >
>>     > K         1.49E5 ±1.5E5
>>     >
>>     > DH       -893.5  ±213
>>     >
>>     > DS       20.7
>>     >
>>     > Was the enthalpy was offset by the ionization of Tris buffer?
>>     >
>>     > Can I use Hepes buffer around pH8 to do ITC?
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >   Welcome any comments about the statistics and suggestions on how to
>>     > improve the ITC experiments.have a nice weekend.
>>     >
>>     > Jerry
>>     >
>>
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging. You
>>     IM, we give. Learn more.
>>     <http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join> 
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser! Learn more. 
>> <http://biggestloser.msn.com/>
>> <test-ITC-012608.JPG>
>