I should mention that Cris Cheek''s reading in NY this week was brilliant
as usual, and I scribbled all through it--such solid, elegant work always
gets me going.
For the fashion-minded, Chris wore a red kilt with matching Chinese
shirt. When I asked him he denied any connection with Clan
Scarlet.
Mark
At 01:13 PM 1/27/2008, Mark Weiss wrote:
I talked about this years ago
with Armand Schwerner. We had both experienced a change in the nature of
the drive to write, that it had become less a compulsion and more a
choice as we aged. Like a lot of other drives, by the way. How this
functions on a day to day basis is more complex, at least for me. I write
when I write, I don't worry about it much when I don't. My sense is that
neither I nor any readers need volume for its own sake, which is often
accompanied by a vitiation of quality.
On the other hand, I continue to carry my notebook, and in fertile times
I scribble at whatever odd moments--on the subway, at readings, etc. The
extraction or shaping into poems for publication is another matter (or
even showing work to friends)--I tend not to get around to it very often.
This hasn't always been the case. I've always been both diffident and
confused about publication, as witness the 19 year gap between my two
full collections (and when the next comes out in the spring it will have
been an additional 13 years), during which I published little in journals
but was very busy with the rest of my life. But during that time I was
producing finished work. My process has changed: the notebooks tend to
take on a life of their own, and for the most part I tend not to worry
about whipping its parts into any kind of shape unless an mpulse comes
from outside, as recently when Hal Johnson asked me for work for Hamilton
Stone, or when a reading is scheduled.
Which is a long way to say that for me at least publication has been at
best a sporadic motivator.or inhibitor.
One big change for all of us, I think, is the advent of the internet,
which raises all of our profiles. It's especially helpful for those as
diffident as I am.
Mark
At 11:22 AM 1/27/2008, you wrote:
Douglas, you seem sanguine &
accepting about "the basic impulse" being gone.
So, there *is* life after poetry.
I too am interested in what you say about blocks.
I think poetry is social contact. It mightn't look like it, it
might look like the opposite.
I have a short poem
http://maireadbyrne.blogspot.com/2006/01/perfect-art-form-for-those-who-like-to.html
Or maybe publication is social contact. If one has a bad--or even
just cold--experience publishing, it can stop the impulse to publish,
which can stop the impulse to write.
(I mean "publish" in any way poets publish, including just
showing the work to someone else).
Mairead
On Jan 27, 2008 10:52 AM, Douglas Clark
<
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
- ----- Original Message -----
- From: [log in to unmask]
- To:
[log in to unmask]
- Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 12:55 PM
- Subject: Re: Love Poems
- Douglas:
- >"I dont write anymore. I realise that my writers block is
- caused by material in my life that I dont know enough about to
analyse
- properly so it is best left alone."<
- This is interesting Douglas. Could you say more. The issue of how
analysis, or not, of subjective experience feeds into writing, or not,
is, well, interesting.
- Tim A.
- =
-
- Tim
-
- I have always thought of myself
- as a love poet so this is a nice way to finish
- things off.
-
- Re love after thirty years I seemed to lose love
- ten years ago and now the psychotic vestige has gone
- so I am free. So it also means my basic impulse in poetry has gone.
-
- Cheers.
-