Print

Print





On Nov 26, 2007, at 1:51 PM, [log in to unmask] wrote:

>
>
>   Hi Vince,
>
>   To answer your question, I do have a temporal regressor design  
> that corresponds to the spike locations, but I have not used it in  
> GIFT to do a temporal sort.  Is the temporal sort a feature in one  
> of the GIFT menus that I am unaware of?  I can tell you that at  
> each interictal spike identified on the EEG, a canonical  
> hemodynamice response function model was implemented as a model for  
> the HR following an interictal spike.  In the results that I sifted  
> through, one component clearly stands out (the one I sent)  
> regarding the spatial locations of activation I am expecting.   
> However, the corresponding time course is showing BOLD signal  
> decreases at the appropriate times, not increases.  I am puzzled by  
> this.  Any advice would be helpful.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Todd Penney
>
> Quoting Vince Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>:
>
>>  Hi Todd,
>> 	It's hard to tell the sign without seeing your model for spikes.
>> Have you tried creating a regressor that corresponds to the spikes  
>> and use
>> this to perform a temporal sort in GIFT?    Joe, to answer your  
>> comment, the
>> sign/factor score is reflected in the time course that is  
>> plotted.  Seeing
>> both the timecourse and the image give you the sign in the  
>> original data.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Vince
>>
>> P.s.  This might be best addressed if you e-mail the GIFT listserv
>> ([log in to unmask]).
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: SPM (Statistical Parametric Mapping)
>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dien, Joseph
>>> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 7:07 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: [SPM] independent component analysis of fMRI data
>>>
>>> I'm having a little trouble decoding the images due to issues
>>> with the labeling on the scales but one possibility is that
>>> the sign of an activation (or a factor score if using PCA
>>> terminology) is arbitrary.  The only thing that has a
>>> meaningful relationship to the original data is the product
>>> of the loading times the activation (factor score).  Are the
>>> loadings at the voxels of interest positive or negative?
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: SPM (Statistical Parametric Mapping) on behalf of Todd Penney
>>> Sent: Fri 11/23/2007 12:55 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: [SPM] independent component analysis of fMRI data
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    Hello all,
>>>
>>>    I have a question regarding some ICA results I received on
>>> a series
>>> of fMRI images from an epileptic patient who underwent a continuous
>>> EEG-fMRI scan.  The patient was scanned for interictal epileptiform
>>> activity that occurred on her EEG.
>>>
>>>    I performed spatial ICA and found one component that I am
>>> convinced
>>> is related to the interictal epileptic spikes.  The timing of
>>> the BOLD
>>> response corresponds to that of the epileptic spikes and the
>>> activations are occurring in what looks like the temporal lobe (the
>>> patient was diagnosed with right temporal lobe epilepsy).  However,
>>> the activations have a positive z-score but the BOLD response is
>>> showing a DECREASE at each of the spike locations in the
>>> spatial brain
>>> maps (shown by the large signal discharges in the attached images).
>>> This is puzzling to me as I am expecting a BOLD signal increase and
>>> positive spatial weights.  I have attached two .jpg files
>>> showing the
>>> brain maps of the component.  Is it possible that perhaps the BOLD
>>> signals are INCREASING because of the sign ambiguity when doing ICA
>>> and that the spatial weights should be DEACTIVATIONS with the same
>>> z-scores (which means all I have to do is multiply the time
>>> course and
>>> spatial weights by negative 1)?  If not, how is it that I am getting
>>> positive spatial weights with a declining BOLD response at
>>> each spike?
>>>   These results are output from the GIFT ICA program.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Todd Penney
>>
>>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
--------

Joseph Dien
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Department of Psychology
419 Fraser Hall (by the coke machine)
1415 Jayhawk Blvd
University of Kansas
Lawrence, KS 66045-7556
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Office: 785-864-9822 (note: no voicemail)
Fax: 785-864-5696
http://people.ku.edu/~jdien/Dien.html