MY
BOY JACK –
On
ITV 1 – 11th November 2007
My reactions to Sunday’s programme:
People I have spoken to outside the circle of Kipling
enthusiasts were greatly impressed and profoundly moved. They felt that the
production brought out the tragedy and the pity of the Great War. I felt it
could have been even better if there had been more careful checking of facts
and had not been jazzed up with fabricated events.
Generally, I felt the production was better than the stage play
with a more believable Carrie Kipling, played by an American actress. Still
the actual story is, if anything, more dramatic and more poignant. Why was the
story jazzed up and weakened.
1 |
Kipling did not drive – why show him speeding in a
Rolls Royce? |
|
|
2 |
Visit to King George V before the war seems odd. Did
Kipling then know the King and if he did was he on such intimate visiting
terms? Also, would King be in uniform in peace time? The King and Kipling
for the most part were abstemious – would the King have offered whisky
in the morning? Also the King was most unlikely to be used as a channel to
Kipling from Asquith. King comes across as bellicose but in fact there was
some evidence that he and his cousins, the Kaiser and the Tsar tried too late
to intervene to halt the move towards European war. |
3 |
Did John ever apply for the Navy in wartime? I thought
his eyesight was hopeless for Naval standards. |
4 |
Surely Lord Roberts was not a complete invalid. He was
well enough to visit the Army in |
5 |
Kipling had health crisis after John enlisted. Why was
this not mentioned? It was very important in Kipling’s life. |
6 |
Kipling was on journalistic tour in |
7 |
Was John able to see well enough to shoot accurately by
fixing his glasses to his nose? Is the story supported by Army records? |
8 |
The story of the Irish’s soldier’s account of
John’s last moments seems believable, but did this interview ever
happen with the Kipling family? Still, one can say a parable is not a lie. |
9 |
Carrie, as portrayed, is believable as a strong woman
supporting Kipling who perhaps was shattered by the realisation that
John’s death may have been caused by his intervention to secure a
commission in the army. |
10 |
Final interview with King and discussion of death of
King’s son – Prince John? Surely this was kept secret. Prince
John had Down’s Syndrome, or something like it, and died with his
carers. Again, a most improbable meeting which does not, to me, help the
story. |
11 |
As only an occasional visitor, the Bateman settings did
not seem too bad, but the film would have been better if the National Trust
had felt able to agree to shooting on site. From what one hears, the damage
done by movie crews, the National Trust decision was probably sensible. |
Notwithstanding the mistakes in detail which could so easily
have been avoided, I felt the overwhelming sense of tragedy of a family caught
up in the consequences of war, but sensible checking of the facts would have
resulted in an even better production.
Michael Aidin
13 November 2007