Print

Print


medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture

Hello, Meg,

The vow is ancient, probably pre-historical 
record, and is a contract between the vower and a deity.
"Do this for me and I'll do that for you." So, 
yes, as Jim points out for St. Thomas, it was a 
very serious matter indeed to not fulfill a vow. 
For this reason, the OT (Deut. 23:23) states that 
it is better not to make a vow than fail to fulfill one.

Funerary inscriptions, for instance, are vows, 
made before a deity, to never forget the 
deceased. This is the reason the majority of 
known and used ossuaries, as well as the more 
widely known Greek grave circles, do not have a 
name inscribed. (Linear A and B were known, just 
never used on a grave or grave site... much to 
the aggravation of archaeologists. Early 
alphabetic writing dates back to the 18th-century BCE.)

Jim is correct, in *personal* vows/contracts 
(e.g. heal me and I'll decorate your statue), it 
is the choice of words and the intent, that 
matters, not the word order. There are, however, 
some fairly formulaic vows in Phoenician from the 
Tophet at Carthage (pre-7th BCE). (Well, just how 
many ways can you phrase the vow to always 
remember the deceased and to invoke Tanit/Shamash 
to hold the deceased in her/their care?) The 
early Christian "here lies + PN" is a formula and 
a vow to remember made before the Lord and places 
the deceased in the care of the Lord.

Funeraries are *private* vows. *Public* vows, 
though, had some severe restrictions on who could 
make (fecit) a vow and are another matter: they 
are very formulaic. This is because of the 
entitlement formula -- that already appears on 
votive statues of rulers back at Akkad.

Those ancient -- and Medieval rulers -- were not 
boasting; they had to state who and what they 
were to explain why they were entitled to make 
the public offering. We still use the entitlement 
formula on every contract whether between a 
utility to supply gas/electricty/internet/etc. 
and the contractee or between a mortgage lender 
and the purchaser of a piece of real estate. 
Governments use the formula to state why they can tax.

Jim, that's not a far-fetched idea: vows are 
personal contracts -- whether from a ruler or a 
private person -- and the contract is precisely 
what is important -- not the precise order of the 
wording. The vow and the consequences of failure 
to fulfill the vow if the favor is granted is one 
of those "doesn't everybody know that" items that 
did not require official dicta.

I have an article forthcoming that covers this 
material through the early CE period. If you are 
interested, I'll let you know when it comes out. (Supposed to be next month)

Regards,

Rochelle

medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture

>Hello Margaret,
>Just judging from the miracle collections I am 
>familiar with, most notably those of Canterbury
>and Chartres, what seems most instrumental in a 
>vow is the very fact that it was made, and
>in the making was intended.  St Thomas certainly 
>seems to have been very well informed of
>the vows made to him, and whatever form they 
>took, he held the vowees to the letter; and if
>they didn't comply with their vows, he was quick 
>to punish and to punish severely.  Similarly,
>in vows to the Virgin Mary, it seems that it was 
>her invocation, in whatever form, that was the
>important aspect of whether she "heard" the 
>petition or not.  I rather think (on no very firm
>grounds, I'm afraid) that it was not so much a 
>formula of any specific kind that was most
>important in these matters, but a direct 
>communication between the devotee and a saint, who
>apparently had ears open to hear any sort of vow 
>made to him or her.  The "Church" -- with a
>capital C, of course -- appears to have been 
>relatively irrelevant in such matters, and in fact,
>there are many aspects of medieval religion for 
>which scholars all too readily, I believe, look
>in vain to the hegemonic pronouncements of the Church for answers.
>Cheers,
>Jim Bugslag
>
>On 25 Nov 2007 at 14:47, Cormack, Margaret Jean wrote:
>
> > medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and
> > culture
> >
> >  Greetings all,
> >  I´m sure most list-members are quite familiar with the literature on
> >  medieval
> > miracles and canonization procedures, but I´ve run across a query
> > which I don´t think I´ve ever seen addressed. Are there, in the
> > ancient or medieval traditions, official formulas or instructions for
> > making a vow? For what may be vowed? I am specifically interested in
> > vows to saints for health or other purposes, not (for example)
> > careless vows, as in the case of Jephtha´s daughter. I have the
> > feeling this was just common knowledge - everybody knew roughly what
> > to do - but I wondered whether theologians (or authors of
> > penitentials?) may have said about it, if anything. I´d be
> > particularly interested in learning of terms in other languages that
> > might correspond to the Icelandic 'confirm, formalize' - in the
> > Icelandic miracle collections, we are often told, after a vow, 'and
> > then s/he festa heitit', which I would translate as 'formally
> > confirmed (the English analogue for 'festa' is 'fasten') the vow.
> > There is, however, no indication of what was actually done in this
> > procedure (which happens when the vow is made, I am not talking about
> > paying the vow when the cure has been received, a different matter
> > entirely). I believe that both Vauchez and Finucane have written about
> > the 'power' of the vow being in the words themselves (so, at any rate,
> > claims the article I am reading.) I will dig out these references, but
> > wondered whether there is any further literature on the subject. I
> > would not, myself, have seen medieval vows as particularly good
> > examples of 'the power of words', but if there is literature on this
> > topic I´d like to know about it. Indeed, I´d be happy for a detailed
> > encyclopedia article on the general topic of vows in the Christian
> > tradition, if one exists.
> >  Thanks in advance,
> > Meg Cormack

**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html