 |
 |
Excuse my ignorance, but is there a list published somewhere from VOs which sites and why are "banned" by them? Brian On 15/11/2007, brian davies <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Excuse my ignorance, but is there a list published somewhere from VOs > which sites and why are "banned" by them? > Brian > > On 15/11/2007, Simone Campana <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello. > > > > Sort of. The script considers only the CEs which accept the ATLAS VO and > > since yesterday I consider this issue critical and therefore banned from > > ATLAS production the sites still affected. When you do this in FCR, the way > > the banning is done is removing the ACBR VO:ATLAS from the CE. Therefore > > the script does not check those CEs anymore. We should therefore run the > > script against some BDII which is not filtered by FCR, like the one user for > > SAM tests. > > > > Having said this, it is true that the situation had a big improvement in the > > last week, thanks to the ticketing action. The currently banned sites are > > are about 10, while 1 week ago there were 60 problematic sites. > > > > > > > > > > _____________________________________________ > > From: Antonio Retico > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 11:26 AM > > To: Nicholas Thackray; grid-operations-meeting (Attendees of the Grid > > Operations Meetings); LHC Computer Grid - Rollout > > Subject: RE: Minutes and actions from the WLCG-OSG-EGEE Grid Operations > > Meeting of 12 Nov 2007 > > > > > > > > > > hi Nick, > > > > about action 67 and the comment from Alessandro and Simone reported in the > > minutes: > > > > "There is a .txt file with a query you should run on the BDII to gather the > > relevant info. In addition there is a python script which fetches info from > > the output of the query and generates and output, where sites marked with > > ==> are the problematic ones. " > > > > I suspect that the attached log was still the one from previous week. The > > situation, as reported by the same script, looks now considerably better. > > Most of the GGUS ticket we opened were closed and > > > > today I see > > > > [aretico@lxplus204 VOVIEW] python > > /afs/cern.ch/user/c/campanas/public/VOVIEW/VOViewsConsist.py > > /tmp/a.a | grep "===>" > > > > ===> > > CE:bigmac-lcg-ce.physics.utoronto.ca:2119/jobmanager-lcgcondor-atlas > > TOTrun:9 TOTVOrun:0 TOTwait:0 TOTVOwait:4444 > > > > ===> CE:ce04-lcg.cr.cnaf.infn.it:2119/blah-lsf-atlas > > TOTrun:170 TOTVOrun:0 TOTwait:0 TOTVOwait:0 > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > > > File > > "/afs/cern.ch/user/c/campanas/public/VOVIEW/VOViewsConsist.py", > > line 12, in ? > > > > TOTVOrun += int(a) > > > > ValueError: invalid literal for int(): _UNDEF_ > > > > ===> CE:epgce2.ph.bham.ac.uk:2119/jobmanager-lcgpbs-short > > TOTrun:0 TOTVOrun:0 TOTwait:4444 TOTVOwait:57772 > > > > Three sites still failing, on of which with a generic error. > > > > I would be rather oriented to close the action, if Atlas agrees, of course. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Antonio > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _____________________________________________ > > > > From: Nicholas Thackray > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 10:19 AM > > > > To: grid-operations-meeting (Attendees of the Grid Operations Meetings); > > LHC Computer Grid - Rollout > > > > Subject: Minutes and actions from the WLCG-OSG-EGEE Grid Operations > > Meeting of 12 Nov 2007 > > > > Dear all > > > > > > The minutes and action list from the Grid Operations meeting of Monday 12th > > November can be found attached to the agenda page, here: > > > > http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=23786 > > > > In particular, please check the list of attendees as there are some names > > missing. Send any comments or corrections directly to me. > > > > > > The next meeting will be on Monday, 19th November 2007 15:00 UTC (16:00 > > Swiss local time) > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > Nick Thackray > > > > >