David Groep wrote: > Kyriakos Ginis wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 12:59:13PM +0100, Andreas Haupt wrote: >>> that's not true. Plain SL3 is entering the "legacy mode" on 1st of >>> December. After that only the version 3.0.9 is provided with security >>> updates. But there *is* a maintained SL until October 2010: >>> >>> https://www.scientificlinux.org/distributions/ >> And here is the announcement from the developers: >> >> http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0710&L=scientific-linux-announce&T=0&P=458 >> >> > > Good to hear that the support will remain for SL as well. But the > announcement (also on the web site) could be interpreted in a > different way -- which is just what I accidentally did: ... > > So after Mid-February 2008, anything can happen. In particular, SL 3.0.9 can > continue to have updates built for it, that are just not published in the > repository ;-) And I can be quite asleep. As I read it again with a slightly clearer state of mind, 3.0.9 is exempt from the "obsolete" making. So, 3.0.9 will be OK till 2010 -- sorry for the confusion and the incorrect messsage I sent earlier. It also means that SL3.0.9 (plain SL) and CentOS are equivalent in this respect -- either one is OK. Cheers, DavidG. -- David Groep ** National Institute for Nuclear and High Energy Physics, PDP/Grid group ** ** Room: H1.56 Phone: +31 20 5922179, PObox 41882, NL-1009DB Amsterdam NL **