ons 2007-10-31 klockan 09:57 -0700 skrev Wayne Hodgins:
Michael, et al. My apologies for not being able to attend this
meeting as it conflicts with another that I chair and was not able to
move. However I'd be glad to work with Michael or others to establish
the new IEEE LTSC Working Group for this and we should be able to have
this all done within the next few weeks. Thanks to Michael, I have
the wording for the PAR and will look after getting this submitted
this week and follow up with you once it is approved by IEEE.
Thanks Wayne! And you'll still be able to see all the work (and even the
meetings!)
Mikael, before I submit the PAR I need to confirm and get some
additional information. As soon as I get these
1. You would like this to be organized under IEEE 1484.12 LTSC LOM
correct? As LOM is what IEEE refers to as a "multi-part standard"
this means that the new standard you are developing will become IEEE
LTSC 1484.12.x (most likely .2 but I need to check as we used this
number previously and then withdrew it)
Yes, that's the idea. Of course, I'm not too concerned about numbering.
NOTE: you have the option to create more than one new "part" or
standard if you wish (now or later) to produce more than one document
or standard. Each one of these would have their own Scope, Purpose,
name and number.
For reference the LOM Data Model is 1484.12.1 and the LOM XML
Actually, now that you mention it, it might be interesting to at least
look at this possibility. I can see two potential candidates
1. Standard for LOM element RDF vocabulary
2. Recommended practice for LOM -> DCAM mapping (using the above).
instead of bundling them into one standard. The current PAR would then
cover the second part. Opinions?
2. This will be what IEEE refers to as a "individual activity" as
opposed to a corporate/entity activity correct? This means that
balloting and work on this standard will be done by individuals as
opposed to organizations (what IEEE refers to as entities). Currently
all LTSC standards and WGs are based on individuals. This affects
things like voting so is quite important. My recommendation is to do
this as an individual activity as this has worked well over the years
for LTSC and is similar to how DCMI operates.
Yes, certainly.
3. You would like this to be a "Recommended Practice" correct?
Yes, that's what we are currently aiming for.
4. What would you like the official title to be? This will be what
is officially recorded as the proper name for the resultant document
(recommended practice). For example in the case of LOM 1484.12.3 is
officially known as "IEEE 1484.12.3 Standard for Learning Technology—
Extensible Markup Language (XML) Schema Definition Language Binding
for Learning Object Metadata Data Model"
The title will always start with "Standard for ......."
Actually, I think you're wrong - it should be "Recommended Practice
for...". My suggestion is
Recommended Practice for Expressing IEEE Learning Object Metadata
Instances Using the Dublin Core Abstract Model.
Sorry for all the questions but important to get this correct on the
official application so we don't have to go back in and make changes
later (though this is always possible BTW) Again my regrets for not
being able to be on the call today to address all this but will work
closely with you to have this all approved ASAP.
Thanks for all the help, it means a lot.
/Mikael
Thanks again for all your hard work and perseverance with this.
Looking forward to seeing all the years of work soon result in an
approved de jure standard!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wayne Hodgins Phone: +1-707-803-3579
Strategic Futurist
Autodesk Inc. FAX: +1-707-773-1285
Send surface mail to:
258 Eucalyptus Rd.
Petaluma, CA
94952 USA
Chair,
IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee P1484.12
Learning Objects Metadata Group
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 6:58 AM
Subject: Re: Meeting Wed October 31
fre 2007-10-12 klockan 11:57 +0200 skrev Mikael Nilsson:
Hi everyone!
Time for a new meeting in the task force. The time is
Wednesday, October 31
13.00 GMT
Well, well.... the meeting starts in one minute!
/Mikael
That's 14.00 BST, 15.00 CET, see
Flashmeeting URL:
Agenda:
* Refactoring current documents in light of DCAM-2007
See Workplan (in separate mail)
* Registering an IEEE Working Group
lightweight videoconferencing run from within your browser. No software
installation except Adobe Flash player needed. It should work on
Windows, Mac and Linux. Webcam and microphone optional. - there's a chat
included. Please try the demo before participating:
NOTE: The flashmeeting will be RECORDED, and the result published on
this list for everyone to see. I do think a recorded meeting is a great
service to the community, but if this is unacceptable to you, let me
know and we may consider rearranging that.
Some details below.
/Mikael
Go to the following address for full details and to access the event:
A .ics calendar file can be downloaded prior to the meeting from the
above address.
Although guest entry is available into the meeting, attendees who do not
already have an account may wish to create one prior to the meeting so
that they can Sign In to the meeting and have access to all the meetings
features etc. A link to create a Sign In account is available via the
meeting web page.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THIS MEETING IS SET TO BE RECORDED
Once the meeting has been completed the replay and minutes of the
meeting can be accessed using the address above i.e the url used to
access the live meeting.
Please note: The replay of this meeting will be publically available and
will, for instance, be listed on the public replays web page
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more details regarding FlashMeeting and terms of use visit the
project website at:
--
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
