Print

Print


If this is a serious request, I have the very post card if that's
helpful

Bob

 

-----Original Message-----
From: The UK Community Psychology Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Annie Mitchell
Sent: 31 October 2007 20:26
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [COMMUNITYPSYCHUK] formalising our network

 

Re a logo: for the  Exeter conference we had a fantastic logo designed
for us by  socialist participatory artist Ken Sprague. we had lots of
positive feedback about it  and I think  it gave us a good sense of
collective identity and meaning  ( do people remember: it was a fishy:
many small fish collectively eating up one big fish. I could try to see
if we still had it somewhere useable?

 

 

Annie 

 

 

 

Annie Mitchell

 

Clinical Director,

Doctorate in Clinical Psychology, 

School of Applied Psychosocial Studies,

Faculty of Health and Social Work, 

University of Plymouth,

Peninsula Allied Health Collaboration, 

Derriford Road, 

Plymouth, 

Devon

PL6 8BH

 

 

Phone  Programme Administrators:
Jane Murch, Emma Hellingsworth

01752 233786

 

Please note I  work 3 days per week: 

usually Monday, Tuesday & either Wednesday or Thursday. 

From: The UK Community Psychology Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Paul@home
Sent: 31 October 2007 17:59
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: formalising our network

 

Yes, 50 Euro discount might be the carrot, and the threat of our network
being subsumed by the BPS (if we are successful in opening up a CP
section in the BPS in the next year or two) might be the stick.

 

ICCP2 (Second International Conference on Community Psychology) will
soon be asking us if we have a logo for the CPUK network that we can
place on their conference website to show the support and solidarity of
com psys in the UK with other com psychs in the world.  Anyone fancy
designing a logo? Anyone object to having a logo? (no idea what would
happen if someone did object given we have no agreed method of reaching
a collective decision on anything). am happy to have a go if a few
others want to join me.

 

Who knows, if we can all agree on a logo, it might open a path for us to
try and decide on a minimal set of core principles and some consensus on
how to properly constitute our network .... As mentioned by others, the
process of setting out some core principles was begun in Birmingham but
has yet to be taken up by the network/discussion list. The UKCP
conference in York introduced the idea of shaping our network into a
community co-operative but again our network/discussion list has failed
to take up the idea. 

 

Perhaps it is time to roll back the Thatcher years and rebuild our
social institutions so that they stand for something more than the
individual ... we can start with our own CPUK network. Seems the time is
right given CP is taking centre stage in Europe next year (in Lisbon)
and CP might become a part of the BPS a year or two after.

 

Wouldn't it be a shame if at that conference 'the world' doesn't see our
network but only sees the few individuals (a few individual UK-based
academics, even fewer individual UK-based practioners and even fewer
still individual UK-based service survivors/users) who can secure the
funding and leave to go.

 

Wouldn't it be a shame if our network's first set of rules and regs
becomes those of the BPS (in so far as the BPS section would be the only
formally constituted part of our network) and we become subjects
(literally) to the society's Royal Charter and find teh ability of our
network as a whole to speak potentially circumvented by BPS regs that
states any action that brings the BPS or the profession of psychology
into disrepute would be regarded as a breach of social ethics. While
joining the BPS will offer our network many benefits, surely we don't
want their rules and regs to be ours and that we want our own
constitution to protect ourselves from theirs - one that licenses us to
show how psychology is disreputable or at least protects us if/when
psychology turns on us to tell us that we are the disreputable ones.

 

Can we first move to becoming a collective of individuals that is
formally constituted and then move to become an individual collective
that is politically formidable? 

 

p

 

p

 

Paul Duckett
Division of Psychology and Social Change
Manchester Metropolitan University
England
Phone +44 161 247 2552
Fax +44 161 247 6364
email: [log in to unmask] 

	-----Original Message-----
	From: The UK Community Psychology Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Jacqueline Akhurst
(J.Akhurst)
	Sent: 31 October 2007 11:03
	To: [log in to unmask]
	Subject: Re: 30th anniversary of community psychology in Italy

	Hi David,

	 

	I'm supportive of your message - I think it's important for us
to be active in making links with our European counterparts, and trying
to widen our links with them, particularly if we are thinking towards
some sort of collective organisation which may seek to affiliate with
the ECPA.

	 

	By the way, I see from the flyer for the ICCP in Lisbon 4 - 6
June (see http://www.2iccp.com/ ) that there's a 50 Euro fee reduction
for 'members of 'National Community Psychology Associations' - might
this be the sort of carrot for us to try and formalise our
'cooperative'?

	 

	Thanks,

	Jacqui

___________________________________ COMMUNITYPSYCHUK - The discussion
list for community psychology in the UK. To unsubscribe or to change
your details visit the website:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/COMMUNITYPSYCHUK.HTML For any problems
or queries, contact the list moderator Rebekah Pratt on
[log in to unmask] or Grant Jeffrey on [log in to unmask] 

___________________________________ COMMUNITYPSYCHUK - The discussion
list for community psychology in the UK. To unsubscribe or to change
your details visit the website:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/COMMUNITYPSYCHUK.HTML For any problems
or queries, contact the list moderator Rebekah Pratt on
[log in to unmask] or Grant Jeffrey on [log in to unmask] 


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system security manager ([log in to unmask]).Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, unless otherwise specifically stated.
**********************************************************************


___________________________________
COMMUNITYPSYCHUK - The discussion list for community psychology in the UK.
To unsubscribe or to change your details visit the website:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/COMMUNITYPSYCHUK.HTML
For any problems or queries, contact the list moderator Rebekah Pratt on [log in to unmask] or Grant Jeffrey on [log in to unmask]