 |
 |
On Nov 3 2007, Randy J. Read wrote: > Depends on the purpose. From the LLG, I want to see that it is positive > (negative means that I'm being too optimistic about the quality of the > model, i.e. the RMS error is higher or the completeness lower than > assumed), and I would like to see it increase as the solution becomes > more complete (i.e. RF score increases with TF, which increases for RF on > second molecule, and so on). But to assess the significance of a > solution, I'd place more weight on the LLG. Oops! Tassos just pointed out my slip here. I'd meant to say that to assess the significance of a solution, I'd place more weight on the Z-score, not the LLG. Randy Read