Print

---

In particular, check this one...
J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10511con_0001.img

Best regards,
-John

On Tuesday 23 October 2007 18:06, Bas Neggers wrote:
> Dear Keiko,
>
> check the dimensions of your images one by one with the display button
> (look at the image dimension parameters, eg A x B x C voxels, voxel
> size, voxel-to-world mapping). It might be that for one of your images
> these values are different, which is not allowed before doing voxel
> based GLM (because voxels would then be representing different locations
> for one or more images).
>
> in a script you might want to try something like:
>
> imgs=spm_select
>
> for t=1:size(imgs,1),
> V=spm_vol(imgs(t,:));
> disp(V.fname);
> disp(V.dim);
> disp(V.mat);
> end
>
> to get all the info in one go after selecting your images.
>
> Good luck,
>
> Bas
>
> Keiko Tatsumi schreef:
> > Dear SPMers,
> > I am currently working on the second level specification (group
> > analysis) using SPM5 batching for the first time; SPM keeps giving me
> > the same error message:
> > The images do not all have the same dimensions.
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10236con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10234con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10235con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10469con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10473con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10474con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10485con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10487con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10492con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10506con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10507con_0001.img
> > [79 95 69] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10511con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10524con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10525con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10543con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10548con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10552con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10560con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10561con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10566con_0001.img
> > [79 95 35] J:\kaiseki\by_EJ_ID\stat_inter_cons\conEJ-EE\10574con_0001.img
> > Error running job:
> > エラー: ==> spm_check_orientations
> > The dimensions must be identical for this procedure.
> > --------------------------
> > Done.
> > I checked the images using "check reg" function but there was not
> > anything unusual about the con images...
> > Incidentally, I downloaded all the patches available at SPM sites.
> > Should you have any information/idea as for how to fix this, please
> > let me know. I truly appreciate your kind help in advance.
> > Keiko Tatsumi