Print

Print


Absolutely. 

Medicine is an art not a science and until the computer people /
Government realise that we should not be wearing white lab coats we are
stuffed. We should really have blck lab coats with silver moons & stars
embroidered [silver because that is antibacterial], and a pointy hat.
Staffs with knobs on the end are optional.



(Chorus.)
A wizard's staff has a knob on the end, knob on the end, knob on the end
A wizard's staff has a knob on the ennndddd!
What he does with it is magic!

A wizard's staff has a knob on the end
And runes run up the shaft
It's long and proud and stiff and loud
It's the pride of wizardcraft.

(Chorus.)

A wizard's staff has a knob on the end
Some are made from thinking wood
With a sapient pair you'd be out to there
And you'd go blind, yes you would.

(Chorus.)

A wizard's staff has a knob on the end
That looks like a silver nut
If you start to bleat when he's taken your seat
He'll crack it up your butt.

(Chorus.)

A wizard's staff has a knob on the end
And the odd frog knows it's true
When your staff has a bend then the spell you send
Can fly right back at you.

(Chorus.)

(Under Construction)
A wizard's staff has a knob on the end
Most useful if they knew it
It's just that fem isn't magical to them
So they never ever do it. 

(Chorus.)

(last verse maestro please)

A wizard's staff has a knob on the end
And you may think it's tragic
That no matter how strong or thick or long
All he can do with it is magic.

(Chorus.)




************************************************************************
*************
Prof. Tim Reynolds,
Queen's Hospital,
Belvedere Rd,
Burton-on-Trent,
Staffordshire,
DE13 0RB

work tel: 01283 511511 ext. 4035
work fax: 01283 593064
work email: [log in to unmask]
home email: [log in to unmask]
************************************************************************
**************
IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual
addressee(s)named above and may contain information that is confidential
privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low
self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs [if you
want to believe in fairy stories and hug pixies that's up to you]. If
you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this email is not authorized (either explicitly or
implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social faux pas. Unless the
word absquatulation has been used in its correct context somewhere other
than in this warning, it does not have any legal or grammatical use and
may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the transmission of this
email, though the kelpie next door is living on borrowed time, let me
tell you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear of the unknown will be
gratified to learn there is no hidden message revealed by reading this
backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice from Macroshaft. However, by
pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your computer you
can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets. If you have received
this eMail in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites, whisk, and
place in a warm oven for 40 minutes.





-----Original Message-----
From: Clinical biochemistry discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Bullock
Sent: 18 October 2007 09:28
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: TnI reports


On 18 Oct 2007 at 9:17, Reynolds Tim wrote:

> Our computer system keeps a record of which analyser is used as part 
> of its audit trail. We don't print it on reports because up till now 
> there has been no need. However, if the NpFIT system requires it we 
> would be able to ass the information. This adds a further complexity. 
> How should analysers be named because there ought to be some 
> commonality - If the analyser is Abbott, which version of abbottt 
> analyser was it. With DPC you could be using an immulite 1000 / 2000 
> or 2500. Practically, there is little difference between the 2000 & 
> 2500 for most assays (but there may be differences for some), and 
> there are differences between the 1000 and the 2000. If you are doing 
> enzymes there is an even greater level of complexity...
> 

Not to mention the issues of calibration material, assigned values 
and (for other analytes) third party reagents . . .

David

Dr David Bullock
Director, Wolfson EQA Laboratory
P O Box 3909, Birmingham B15 2UE, U K
FAX: 0121 414 1179 [+44 121 414 1179]

------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical community
working in clinical biochemistry. Please note, archived messages are
public and can be viewed via the internet. Views expressed are those of
the individual and they are responsible for all message content. ACB Web
Site http://www.acb.org.uk List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.) http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/

------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.
ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/