 |
 |
Is the only way to patch to download the entire package and replace its predecessor? -Dianne On 9/13/07, Peter Smale <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > I have just repatched. I also tried ./monitor in the bedpostX directory > but an error message tells me there is no such file or directory. I couldn't > find it using locate. > > I was also following the thread on probtrackx output filenames and I > noticed that there is no probtrackxOptions.h file in my $FSLDIR/src/fdt. > Am I a beer or two short of a six-pack? > > Cheers, > Peter > > On 9/13/07, Tim Behrens < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > > Hi - > > if you type ./monitor in the bedpostX directory, it should tell you > > how many slices are processed. > > > > Have you patched since the update yesterday? If not, it will take a > > while. > > > > T > > > > On 13 Sep 2007, at 03:06, Peter Smale wrote: > > > > > Hi team, > > > I am running the patched FSL 4.0 on Debian etch. I am enjoying > > > putting FDT > > > through its paces. > > > > > > I wonder if this problem is related: My bedpostx also appears to > > > hang at the > > > "Queueing parallel processing stages" stage. Running top shows that > > > xfibres > > > is working: > > > 4333 root 25 0 12468 8988 2040 R 98 0.4 0:11.42 xfibres > > > and I get the expected output in the xx.bedpostX directory eventually. > > > > > > For some reason, though, there is no output to the terminal saying > > > "X slices > > > processed" like there was with FSL 3.3. I have had a look at > > > /usr/share/lib/fsl/bedpostx and I can't see what's wrong. > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > Peter > > > > -- Dianne Patterson, Ph.D. [log in to unmask] ERP Lab University of Arizona 621-3256 (Office)