Dear
We have a paper under review which uses a
I had a look at the A_to_B_flow_to_std.img images for each subject at
the co-ordinates in question. I hoped to get the displacement of brain boundary
in mm from the voxel intensity at that point. However the mean displacement over
all subjects seemed too small (about a 50th of a 1mm). I went back to the
individual A_to_B_flow.img (flow image in native space) and the flow values were
larger and more reasonable.
I was wondering if values in the flow_to_std image are usually lower
than the corresponding flow images. As the data we are working only shows very
small displacement, to test this further we looked at 3 subjects who had been
scanned 2 years apart where there was evidence of significant brain atrophy.
For each subject we recorded voxel values at 10 'randomly' chosen points in the
lateral ventricle brain/CSF boundary both in the A_to_B_flow_to_std.img and
A_to_B_flow.img file. In the 3 subjects the voxel intensity in the
A_to_B_flow.img seemed to be about right (1.5mm) while the voxel intensities in
the A_to_B_flow_to_std.img file seemed about 10 times too small (0.15mm).
Has anybody else seen this and know why this happens? and is this deliberate
or is it a 'side effect' of the dilation and smoothing steps… or have I
just done something wrong?
Best wishes,
Matthew Kempton