No - it won't happen automatically. I think your excellent bedpost times were a combination of a beefy machine and much fewer directions (bedpost takes a lot longer with more directions).
You should be able to parallelise it, and make it happen 4x as fast!
T
On 22 Aug 2007, at 23:31, Dianne Patterson wrote:
Does this mean it won't happen automatically on a mac? The excellent bedpost times
I've gotten suggested to me that it was all working without explicit parallelizing commands...
-Dianne
On 8/22/07, Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]> wrote: Hi,
You can follow the same instructions except use 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 for your
machines. I setup a quad core CPU this way (that one had four 127s).
Peace,
Matt.
-----Original Message-----
From: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Ted Yanagihara
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 2:19 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [FSL] bedpostx
parallel processing
Hi everyone,
I am running bedpostx on a dual processor machine. I have read the
"Parallelising bedpost" section of the help, but this gives the instructions
for splitting up jobs between multiple machines with each having multiple
processors.
Will bedpostx automatically send to both processors or do I need to manually
set this up? If I need to do this manually, how can I find out what my
machine calls each of its processors (on a mac)?
Thank you!
ted
--
Dianne Patterson, Ph.D.
[log in to unmask]
ERP Lab
University of Arizona
621-3256 (Office)
