 |
 |
Matt - I know this should work, but you might want to check whether it actually does - it is possible that the random seed is fixed at the beginning of the program, so all of your different processes would give you identical outputs. T On 31 Aug 2007, at 12:41, Matt Glasser wrote: > Also, you could split up the number of samples e.g. if you normally > track > with 25000 and have five processors, you could track 5 times with 5000 > samples and add the result. This method is easier if you know a > little > shell scripting. > > -----Original Message----- > From: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On > Behalf > Of Tim Behrens > Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 5:39 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [FSL] Parallelise probtrackx > > Just split your seed mask into as many masks as you have processors, > set them off independently, and add up the answers at the end. > > Cheers > > T > On 31 Aug 2007, at 09:25, Ravi Shetty wrote: > >> I know it is possible to parallelise bedpostx but is it also >> possible to parallelise probtrackx? If so is it >> done using the same method? Thanks. >> >> -Ravi