 |
 |
'pain' is certainly an impairment. Keith On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:06:44 +0100 , Larry Arnold <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >Wow I am not the only one then? > >Bit of a bugger when the body structure, interacting with neurology gives rise >to the construct of pain though :) > >Larry > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: The Disability-Research Discussion List >> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of >> Gregor Wolbring >> Sent: 11 August 2007 13:56 >> To: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: Re: Embedding Disability? 13th September, Birmingham >> >> Keith, >> Yes but language wise its still not very logical. >> and yes one can use human right for pwith imp. but I would >> never clssify myself as such. I am a person with a variation >> in body structure/funcion not as having on impairment. >> Cheers >> Gregor >> > >________________End of message______________________ >This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies). Enquiries about the list administratione should be sent to [log in to unmask] >Archives and tools are located at: >www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html >You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page. > -- Being daily swallowed by men’s eyes, They surfeited with honey and began To loathe the taste of sweetness, whereof a little More than a little is by much too much. So, when he had occasion to be seen, He was but as the cuckoo is in June, Heard, not regarded. William Shakespeare Henry IV, Part 1 (1597) act 3, sc. 2, l. 70