Just to conclude this discussion, now that I understand
this example more clearly, is it the case that the
triple t-test example shown on the FEAT web page
could be made simpler using the different model:
EV1 EV2 EV3 EV4 EV5 EV6 EV7
1 0 1 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 0
1 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 1 1 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 1 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 1
where the contrasts would now be:
EV1 EV2 EV3 EV4 EV5 EV6 EV7
A-B 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0
A-C 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-C 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Or is this not the same?
kind regards
Sophie
