Print

Print


Probably the slowest film I've seen would have been something in a
language I didn't really understand with no subtitles.


On 7/18/07, Henry Miller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> "Time may or may not exist"
>
> I don't know if I'd go that far, but 'slowness' needs thinking out.
> What are we measuring 'over time', as it were -- not distance, but
> what?
>
> On 7/18/07, gyoungblood <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Slow compared to what? The overexcited unconsciousness of commodity cinema?
> > A pretty pathetic comparison, it seems to me. Slow compared to the passing
> > of the hours? Are surveillance videos slow (e.g., Michael Klier's Der
> > Reise)?
> >
> > Clearly, slow/fast are observations about the subject, not the object. The
> > undecideable enigma of time problematizes any such discussion from the
> > beginning, and Bergson, among so many others, nuances the discourse.  If
> > we're into dualisms, I prefer open/closed rather than slow/fast.
> >
> > I would suggest that Warhol's Eat, Kiss, Sleep, Empire, etc. are not, and
> > cannot be said to be, ontologically slow. Santantango, on the other hand, is
> > very slow indeed if one privileges dominant cinema as the reference. Why do
> > that? Time may or may not exist, but there is always choice. A Slow Film
> > Festival, for what it would say not only about our acculturation but about
> > our attention to experience, would inescapably be an embarrassment.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Les Roberts" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 2:25 AM
> > Subject: Re: slow film festival
> >
> >
> > > Another master of 'slow cinema' and of the use of the sequence shot in
> > > particular is Theo Angelopolous. His 4 hour epic 'The Travelling Players'
> > > contains only about 80 shots. The title of his 1998 film 'Eternity and
> > > Day' was deemed somewhat appropriate by certain critics at the time,
> > > unaccustomed as they no doubt were to the typically rather slow pace of
> > > Angelopoulous' work...
> > >
> > > Les Roberts
> > >
> > > *
> > > *
> > > Film-Philosophy salon
> > > After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are
> > > replying to.
> > > To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to:
> > > [log in to unmask]
> > > Or visit: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/film-philosophy.html
> > > For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
> > > *
> > > Film-Philosophy journal: http://www.film-philosophy.com
> > > Contact: [log in to unmask]
> > > **
> > >
> >
> > *
> > *
> > Film-Philosophy salon
> > After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to.
> > To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
> > Or visit: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/film-philosophy.html
> > For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
> > *
> > Film-Philosophy journal: http://www.film-philosophy.com
> > Contact: [log in to unmask]
> > **
> >
>
> *
> *
> Film-Philosophy salon
> After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to.
> To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
> Or visit: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/film-philosophy.html
> For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
> *
> Film-Philosophy journal: http://www.film-philosophy.com
> Contact: [log in to unmask]
> **
>


-- 
_____________________
http://consulting.purico.jp

*
*
Film-Philosophy salon
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to.
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
Or visit: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/film-philosophy.html
For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
*
Film-Philosophy journal: http://www.film-philosophy.com
Contact: [log in to unmask]
**