Print

Print


medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture

You might try the following, John. Despite its catchy title (for an academic book) it's the work of one of the major Byzantine liturgists alive today..

 

 

 

Robert Taft, S.J: The Liturgy of the Hours in East and West: The Origins of the Divine Office and Its Meaning for Today

 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: medieval-religion - Scholarly discussions of medieval religious culture

> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Briggs

> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 5:04 AM

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Subject: Re: [M-R] Breviaries and Noted Breviaries

>

> medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture

>

> Revd Gordon Plumb wrote:

> >

> > I am in the process of a move and all my liturgical books are in

> > boxes in the garage pending erection of shelving ( out of my hands

> > unfortunately!), but have you looked in the volume of the edition of the

> > Hyde Abbey Breviary by J B L Tolhurst - recently reissued as a separate

> > volume - on Monastic Breviaries, which provides a wide-ranging examination

> > of monastric breviaries. Pub by Henry Bradshaw Society.

>

> It doesn't help.  It is entitled "Introduction to the English Monastic [i.e.

> Benedictine] Breviaries", but in reality it is an introduction to the

> monastic Office as contained in those breviaries - which isn't really the

> same thing.  It doesn't seem to  mention the secular breviary, and treats

> the origin of the monastic breviary unproblematically as being for the use

> of individual religious travelling away from their monastery.  This is

> precisely the position that van Dijk & Hazelden Walker reject.

>

> > Van Dijk & Hazelden Walker is good isn't it!

>

> It's a tour-de-force, but I am mildly sceptical. The argument is so

> elaborate that I am not convinced that the individual elements couldn't be

> re-assembled in a different order.  Which is why I am anxious to learn if

> the argument has been subsequently refined, revised, modified, rejected or

> refuted - or just accepted uncritically, of course.

>

> John Briggs

>

> **********************************************************************

> To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME

> to: [log in to unmask]

> To send a message to the list, address it to:

> [log in to unmask]

> To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion

> to: [log in to unmask]

> In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:

> [log in to unmask]

> For further information, visit our web site:

> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html

********************************************************************** To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME to: [log in to unmask] To send a message to the list, address it to: [log in to unmask] To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion to: [log in to unmask] In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to: [log in to unmask] For further information, visit our web site: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html