yes it does the normalisation for you in dtifit, but _not in bedpost_ I believe. 
This should be fixed in the near future.

saad.



On 15 May 2007, at 11:20, Colm G. Connolly wrote:

Hi everybody,

On 5 Mar 2007, at 13:52, Tim Behrens wrote:

I am working with your wonderful diffusion software package and I have one
question concerning the sample data for the Fdt tutorial, especially about
the direction scheme. Looking at the given bvecs file I noticed that the
gradient vectors are not unit vectors; they all sum up to approximately
1.019. Could you explain me why?

No reason - In early versions of FDT this would matter, and would give you an underestimate of the diffusivity (leaving all other parameters unchanged). In the current version, I believe they are normalised internally in FDT code, so it should make no difference at all.

Just to clarify, does this mean that I do not need to normalise the bvecs for my data, that I can instead just plug in the values I got from my scanner manufacturer and FDT will perform the normalisation itself?

Thanks  in advance,

--
Dr Colm G. Connolly
School of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience
The Lloyd Building
University of Dublin
Trinity College, Dublin 2, Éire
Tel: +353-1-896-8475
Fax: +353-1-671-3183

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Saad Jbabdi, 
Postdoctoral Research Assistant,  
Oxford University FMRIB Centre

FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford  OX3 9DU, UK
+44 (0) 1865 222545  (fax 222717)
[log in to unmask]    http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~saad
---------------------------------------------------------------------------