Hi,
Sorry - I'm not quite sure what you are asking here.
Are you saying that you have a method that works well for
poor 3D images, but with good 3D images it fails?
I'm also not sure what your script actually does.
If you can let me know a bit more then hopefully I can help.
All the best,
Mark
Joerg Magerkurth wrote:
>Hi Mark,
>
>sorry that I answering so late, I was busy with other studies. Now I have
>registrate the most of the subjects and the biggest part of it looks good.
>
>I have changed your routine, such a way, that the script do an iterative way
>of four steps: every step take the matrix from the last for the init-option.
>So the result becomes still a little bit better in each step. I have tried
>this with good 3D datas, but there it goes wrong. I would be gratefull if
>you can explain this. But it is not so important. Only if you have some time.
>
>Best,
>
> Joerg
>
>
