 |
 |
The support for this cause (of legalising asylum seekers and other migrants with no UK work rights currently working here illegally) intrigues me, especially the class, membership, agenda debates.... >>Support has also come from faith leaders, trade unions, >businesses and >>NGOs concerned at the emergence of a sub-class of person in today's >>Britain who are part of our society yet without access to the basic >>rights which its citizens take for granted. OK I can see why faith leaders would support it , religion is dying on its feet amongst indigenous britons; many migrants come from deeply religious countries - Catholic Christian, Muslim, Hindu, etc etc. NGOs. well that's their job, their raison d'etre. Busnesses, well obviously, they gain from an enlarged pool of cheap labour, (and just maybe some can thus get labour below the Min Wage, but won't go into that here). But trades unions - now that's interesting. The Union itself can gain from larger membership, increased dues. But the original members may see their earnings power diluted, and if Unions gain their membership more from the lower paid in the Uk workforce, the original members gain least, amongst the UK consumer population, from the cheaper prices facilitated by an increased lower wage UK workforce. Original members may also lose out in two more ways - rents and property prices are trended upwards, this benefitting mostly the wealthier with larger houses, - and the lower inflation had produced lower interest rates, again benefitting industrial investors and larger house owners but not so much lower paid Union members renting and facing increased rents with no capital gain in property at all (and maybe reduced wage rises due to lower overall inflation). Has there been a debate about the agenda of Union leaders versus the agenda of their members? (this must be one of the few occasions Trades Unions and businesses have found common cause) Hillary Shaw, Newport, Shropshire.