 |
 |
Hi Roger - you sent my limited vocabulary off to the dictionary on "japes" - assume it is a long "a" and not "japs". Not a common word here in California! I don't understand a need to apologize to Candace, unless it was for not seeing her one poem. Was that it?? Between us I find her constant yammering and meddling not that very interesting, in fact I often hit the delete button. Not enough time in the day. As you might remember or not from her previous presence on this list, her strategy is to often make people feel guilty for questioning her motives and demand apologies. Whether or not she posted one poem, I think I would rather have poetry provide the foundation for response on the list, not the peripheral, distracting babble that I find her prone too. Well, I do go on too long. My apologies to you! Be well, Stephen V > Japes aside, I think you owe Candice an apology, Stephen. > > Roger > > On 4/9/07, Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> Ahem... >>> >>> Roger Day wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I wouldn't want to front-channel meddle with a pro's plumbing either, >>>> not without an invite anyway. >> >> Gentlemen and Gentlewomen, we, or I, was talking about the poem's plumbing - >> or, alternatively, if you want to think architecture with plumbing, say, the >> façade of Centre de Pompidou. Yes, the poem's "pompidou"! >> >> Other than that, me loves the quote below from the Elder. Times I have >> written without any or, alternatively, proclamation of all zee forsaid. The >> question always remains whether or not it be good writing, me believe. I >> think we have all been various in that category. >> Thank you MJ. >> >> Stephen V >> http://stephenvincent.net/blog/ >> >> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> A man may write of love, and not be in love, as well as of husbandrie, and >>> not >>> goe to plough: or of witches, and be none: or of holinesse, and be flat >>> prophane. - Giles Fletcher the Elder. >> >