Print

Print


i have had my ups and downs
but wotthehell wotthehell
yesterday sceptres and crowns
fried oysters and velvet gowns
and today i herd with bums
but wotthehell wotthehell
i wake the world from sleep
as i caper and sing and leap
when i sing my wild free tune
wotthehell wotthehell
under the blear eyed moon
i am pelted with cast off shoon
but wotthehell wotthehell

do you think that i would change
my present freedom to range
for a castle or moated grange
wotthehell wotthehell
cage me and i d go frantic
my life is so romantic
capricious and corybantic
and i m toujours gai toujours gai

i know that i am bound
for a journey down the sound
in the midst of a refuse mound
but wotthehell wotthehell
oh i should worry and fret
death and i will coquette
there s a dance in the old dame yet
toujours gai toujours gai

i once was an innocent kit
wotthehell wotthehell
with a ribbon my neck to fit
and bells tied onto it
o wotthehell wotthehell
but a maltese cat came by
with a come hither look in his eye
and a song that soared to the sky
and wotthehell wotthehell
and i followed adown the street
the pad of his rhythmical feet
o permit me again to repeat
wotthehell wotthehell

my youth i shall never forget
but there s nothing i really regret
wotthehell wotthehell
there s a dance in the old dame yet
toujours gai toujours gai

the things that i had not ought to
i do because i ve gotto
wotthehell wotthehell
and i end with my favorite motto
toujours gai toujours gai

Thank you, O inimitable Don Marquis



MC Ward wrote:
> "Wottehell" is forbidden (everybody knows that).
>
> Snarkily  (sp?) yours,
> Candice
>
>
>
> --- Roger Day <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>   
>> You can post what you like if you're a private
>> individual; if you post
>> representing an organisation, well, yes, from the
>> organisation's POV,
>> yes, it does matter. For a start, you wouldn't get
>> snarky threads like
>> this happening. If the Editor of the Guardian writes
>> to me, then I
>> expect his missives to be perfect and in good order,
>> if the missive is
>> full of spelling mistakes then well ... OTOH, if
>> Alan Rusbridger
>> writes to me as one individual to another, even on
>> an open forum, then
>> wottehell. I don't care. He can even say shit or
>> fuck if he wants. So
>> I guess the answer to your question is contextual.
>> If you email the
>> forum with news of an event/organisation, then,
>> unless the email
>> states otherwise, I will assume that there is
>> connection between you
>> and that event/organisation.
>>
>> Is there a point in being anal? I guess,
>> unfortunately, that's my job;
>> that's what computer scientists and engineers do
>> best. They dance on
>> pin-heads for a living, arguing about the validity
>> or watchemacallit
>> of symbols, signs and semantics. It's the comic-book
>> guy from the
>> Simpsons, but worse. However, as text-smiths, if we
>> aren't anal about
>> words, and you take analness to be some sort of
>> measure of care,
>> absorption etc, what do we care about?
>>
>> As for the usage of the word "shit", it's not the
>> word that's the
>> issue, it's who it was said by (forum moderator) is
>> a slight issue.
>> Speaking as an ordinary list-member, I don't mind if
>> list-members use
>> the words shit and fuck in any and every email, but,
>> like it or not,
>> once you're the forum moderator, added-value get's
>> attached to any
>> email you send, whatever the context.
>>
>> Roger
>>
>> On 4/2/07, Joseph Duemer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>     
>>> So if I post that the Wallace Stevens Journal, for
>>>       
>> which I am an editor, is
>>     
>>> interested in poems dealing with Stevens' life &
>>>       
>> themes, it's not really me
>>     
>>> posting? How does that transformation occur? And
>>>       
>> is the entity that posts in
>>     
>>> my place to be held to more exacting editorial
>>>       
>> standards than me, when I
>>     
>>> post as myself?
>>>
>>> jd
>>>
>>> On 4/2/07, Roger Day <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> He's posting for ICORN, not as an individual.
>>>>         
>> ICORN, whose aims I
>>     
>>>> sympathise with, is supposed to be a "literary"
>>>>         
>> quarterly involved in
>>     
>>>> the translation of poetry, has been advertised
>>>>         
>> by an email which
>>     
>>>> contains at least two major spelling mistakes
>>>>         
>> concerning a poet's name
>>     
>>>> and one of his better poems; I notice the rest
>>>>         
>> of the email was
>>     
>>>> immaculate. Maybe I expect too much; but you
>>>>         
>> expect no one to comment?
>>     
>>>> This list is full of smart-arses, that's one of
>>>>         
>> it's speicial
>>     
>>>> qualities. I remember someone calling it the
>>>>         
>> awkward squad.
>>     
>>>> Roger
>>>>
>>>> On 4/2/07, Joseph Duemer <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>         
>> wrote:
>>     
>>>>> Ren Powell is a member of this, uh, community.
>>>>>           
>> Posts to the list from
>>     
>>>>> members are not, by definition, "spam." In
>>>>>           
>> fact, it is quite common for
>>     
>>>>> members to post announcements to the list
>>>>>           
>> about various journals,
>>     
>>>> readings,
>>>>         
>>>>> etc. And if we all posted corrections to each
>>>>>           
>> others typos &
>>     
>>>> misspellings we
>>>>         
>>>>> would crash the server.
>>>>>
>>>>> jd
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/2/07, Roger Day <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>           
>> wrote:
>>     
>>>>>> Greetings BenjiMouse. Just in time to
>>>>>>             
>> witness the, uh, shit hitting
>>     
>>>> the
>>>>         
>>>>>> fan.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> re: Wellfed Owens: fine by me if Poetry orgs
>>>>>>             
>> wish to spam this list,
>>     
>>>>>> at least they should get the poetry bits
>>>>>>             
>> correctly spelled etc o'wise
>>     
>>>>>> it dents their credibility, no?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Roger
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/2/07, Robin Hamilton
>>>>>>             
>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>     
>>>>>>> From: "MJ Walker" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> There is a life elsewhere.
>>>>>>>> mj
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> No there isn't -- ask Coriolanus.  Or
>>>>>>>               
>> Cavafy, in "The City".
>>     
>>>>>>> PedantMouse
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> My Stuff: http://www.badstep.net/
>>>>>> "Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious."
>>>>>>             
>> Oscar Wilde
>>     
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Joseph Duemer
>>>>> Professor of Humanities
>>>>> Clarkson University
>>>>> [sharpsand.net]
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> --
>>>> My Stuff: http://www.badstep.net/
>>>> "Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious." Oscar
>>>>         
>> Wilde
>>     
>>>
>>> --
>>> Joseph Duemer
>>> Professor of Humanities
>>> Clarkson University
>>> [sharpsand.net]
>>>
>>>       
>> -- 
>> My Stuff: http://www.badstep.net/
>> "Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious." Oscar Wilde
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>  
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a PS3 game guru.
> Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
> http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121
>
>   

-- 
Tad Richards
http://www.opus40.org/tadrichards/
http://opusforty.blogspot.com/