Dear Lauchlan, Yes, this is a case of design as I see it. There are many kinds of design, and this is one of them. This involves a simple and -- most likely -- a tame problem. To distinguish whether the simple problem is indeed tame would require a specific case. Whether the designer has done many business cards before would not necessarily make this a tame problem. If the business card is designed to the specifications of a corporate design manual, THAT would make it a tame problem. Despiute this fact, the graphic designer designing a business card is, indeed, practicing design. Again, I define design as "a goal-oriented process for solving problems, meeting needs, improving situations, or creating something new or useful." This example meets that definition. The fact that you use the term "designing" in your question suggests you agree with me, at least in ordinary language. Most graphic designers would also assert that this is an example of design practice. To pose the question back, how could designing a business card to the standards of a corporate design manual NOT be design? If it is not an example of design practice, what is it? Yours, Ken Lauchlan Mackinnon wrote: In your view, can you do 'design' for tame problems, or only wicked ones? e.g. if a graphic designer is designing a business card and the problem is 'tame' (they've done it before and they know what to do) then is it 'design' in your view?