Print

Print


Yes, I am reading that, and I am stuck on that. That's why I want to ask Christian, coz he wrote the report. 

Do you know when he will be back on Email again?

Thanks 

Xuelin

****************************************
Xuelin Cui
Department of Electrical Engineering
University of Hawaii-Manoa
Honolulu HI 96822

Tel: 1-808-349-0983
Email: [log in to unmask]
****************************************

----- Original Message -----
From: Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Monday, March 12, 2007 11:43 am
Subject: Re: [FSL] some theoretical questions on MELODIC
To: [log in to unmask]

> Hi -
> Christian is away at the moment I'm afraid. He is off email,  but 
> did  
> you see that steve answered your questions as well as pointing you 
> to  
> the tech report.
> 
> T
> 
> 
> On 12 Mar 2007, at 21:36, Xuelin Cui wrote:
> 
> > hi Steve:
> >
> > Thanks for reply
> >
> > But could you please forward my email to Christian? I am reading  
> > the technique report. Those questions are exactly the questions 
> on  
> > the technique report.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Xuelin
> >
> > ****************************************
> > Xuelin Cui
> > Department of Electrical Engineering
> > University of Hawaii-Manoa
> > Honolulu HI 96822
> >
> > Tel: 1-808-349-0983
> > Email: [log in to unmask]
> > ****************************************
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>
> > Date: Monday, March 12, 2007 7:34 am
> > Subject: Re: [FSL] some theoretical questions on MELODIC
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> As well as Christian's main techrep, you should read the basic
> >> intro
> >> to ICA at:
> >> http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/analysis/techrep/tr01mj2/tr01mj2.pdf
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12 Mar 2007, at 09:34, Xuelin Cui wrote:
> >>
> >>> hi Christian:
> >>>
> >>> I have a question on equation 5 in you technique report 2.
> >>>
> >>> Equation 5 seems to be the maximum likelihood estimation of
> >> mixing
> >>> matrix. It is:
> >>> A_ml=U_q*(lamda_q-sigma^2*I)^1/2*Qt
> >>> Is U_q the eigenvector matrix directly solved from the 2D fMRI
> >> data
> >>> by PCA?
> >>
> >> Nearly: it is the top q eigenvectors from the initial data PCA.
> >>
> >>> If so, should each of the column vector in U_q be orthogonal?
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >>
> >>> Also, I dont really figure out that where does the Q matrix come
> >>> from. Since it is a rotational matrix, each column of it should
> >> be
> >>> orthogonal too, right? Why we need Q here?
> >>
> >> Q is the final ICA rotation within the space produced by the PCA.
> >> WIthout Q you would just have PCA.
> >>
> >> Steve.
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks a lot in advance
> >>>
> >>> Xuelin
> >>>
> >>> ****************************************
> >>> Xuelin Cui
> >>> Department of Electrical Engineering
> >>> University of Hawaii-Manoa
> >>> Honolulu HI 96822
> >>>
> >>> Tel: 1-808-349-0983
> >>> Email: [log in to unmask]
> >>> ****************************************
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: Christian Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>
> >>> Date: Tuesday, March 6, 2007 5:06 pm
> >>> Subject: Re: [FSL] some theoretical questions on MELODIC
> >>> To: [log in to unmask]
> >>>
> >>>> Xuelin,
> >>>>
> >>>> all of these questions are readily answered in the technical
> >>>> report
> >>>> http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/analysis/techrep/tr02cb1/tr02cb1.pdf
> >>>>
> >>>>> 1. Is PCA applied to the data before ICA is applied? (to
> >>>> decrease
> >>>>> the dimentionality)
> >>>> Yes, the maximum likelihood estimate is given by a rotated PCA
> >>>> solution (equation 5 in the TR)
> >>>>
> >>>>> 2. If PCA is applied as a preprocessing, where are those
> >>>> principal
> >>>>> components fed into?(put it in this way: After PCA applied, we
> >>>> have
> >>>>> a matrix E of some eigenvectors, is E same with X? where X=MS,
> >>>> X:
> >>>>> mixed information, M: mixing matrix, S: source)
> >>>> Nope, PCA uses the Eigenvectors of the data covariance matrix of
> >>>> X,
> >>>> see text after equation 5
> >>>>
> >>>>> 3: What criterion is used to extract those ICs by MELODIC?
> >>>>> (minimize the negentropy?)
> >>>> Approximations to neg-entropy, see text and equation 12
> >>>>
> >>>>> 4. What on earth are those ICs, which are extracted by MELODIC?
> >>>> Projections of the data which are maximally non-Gaussianity - see
> >>>> text and equation 12. You might find the section on 'uniqueness'
> >>>> interesting, too
> >>>>
> >>>> hope this helps
> >>>> Christian
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks a lot in advance
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Xuelin
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ****************************************
> >>>>> Xuelin Cui
> >>>>> Department of Electrical Engineering
> >>>>> University of Hawaii-Manoa
> >>>>> Honolulu HI 96822
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tel: 1-808-349-0983
> >>>>> Email: [log in to unmask]
> >>>>> ****************************************
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>  Christian F. Beckmann
> >>>>  Oxford University Centre for Functional
> >>>>  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain,
> >>>>  John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
> >>>>  Email: [log in to unmask] -
> >>>> http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~beckmann/  Phone: +44(0)1865 222551
> >>>> Fax: +44(0)1865 222717
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> >> ----
> >> ---
> >> Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
> >> Associate Director,  Oxford University FMRIB Centre
> >>
> >> FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford  OX3 9DU, UK
> >> +44 (0) 1865 222726  (fax 222717)
> >> [log in to unmask]    http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> >> ----
> >> ---
> >>
>