FW: Greenpeace win judicial Review!
fyi
From: David Polden <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:56:18 +0000
To: David Polden <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: FW: Greenpeace win judicial Review!
-----Original Message-----
From: Emma Gibson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 15 February 2007 13:47
To: David Polden
Subject: Greenpeace win judicial Review!
Governmentıs Nuclear Plans declared unlawful by High Court
For immediate release: 15 February 2007
THE GOVERNMENTıS decision to back a new fleet of nuclear power stations was today declared to be unlawful in the High Court.
The Government will have to conduct a new, fuller review if they want to justify the future of nuclear power in the UK.
In the Royal Courts of Justice in London, Mr Justice Sullivan agreed with Greenpeace, who brought the case, that the energy review was not the fullest public consultationı the Government had committed itself to before making a decision to back new nuclear power stations. The commitment had been made in the earlier energy white paper in 2003.
Mr Justice Sullivan said that the consultation exercise was ²seriously flawed and that the process was manifestly inadequate and unfair² because insufficient information had been made available by the Government for consultees to make an ³intelligent response².
The court had heard last week that the Government failed to present clear proposals and information on key issues surrounding a new generation of nuclear power stations, such as dealing with radioactive waste and financial costs. Greenpeace and other groups were also denied the opportunity to comment on relevant documents which the Government failed to disclose.
Sarah North, head of Greenpeaceıs nuclear campaign, said: ³The Governmentıs so-called consultation on nuclear power was obviously a sham, and weıre pleased that the Judge has agreed with us.
³The Government completely failed to consult adequately and even kept relevant documents to themselves. Theyıve now been forced back to the drawing board to conduct a proper and lengthy review.
³Nuclear power is a dangerous distraction from the real solutions to climate change as it only represents 3.6% of our total energy. Itıs entirely obvious that there are more efficient, effective, safer and cheaper ways than nuclear power to meet our energy needs and cut climate change emissions. 10 new nuclear power stations would only cut C02 emissions by 4%. As well as being too little, it will also be too late. Climate wrecking emissions need to be cut now, not in 20 years.²
ENDS
For more information, contact the Greenpeace press office on 020 7865 8255
Why nuclear power isnıt the answer to climate change:
- 10 new nuclear power stations would only cut the UKıs c02 emissions by 4%. This would be wiped out by the predicted rise in aircraft emissions alone.
- New nuclear power is not a relevant or timely response to the immediate need to reduce C02 emissions. Any nuclear new build programme would not see the first reactor come online until around 2018 at the earliest, with the main delivery of the programme not arriving until around 2025-2030. C02 emissions need to be cut years before.
- Nuclear powerıs effect on C02 emissions is very small. Although nuclear power currently provides about 20% of our electricity (reactor problems regularly reduce this), it only provides 3.6% of the UKıs total energy.
- Nuclear power stations only marginally address hot water and central heating needs, and donıt meet needs for transport at all.
- There is no safe solution to nuclear waste.
- There is a much cheaper, better way to meet our energy needs and cut C02 emissions. A decentralised energy system will slash C02 and cost far less than a new generation of nuclear power stations, making maximum use of combined heat and power and renewable energy.
