Hello All
This message has 3 functions (they are the headings in bold).
Update on developments regarding the day.
Back in 2006 I sent out a set of questions, to which a
number of people responded (many thanks to them). I had asked for responses
before Christmas (in case there was a need to book an outside speaker).
Since then I have looked at the responses and summarised
them. I have shared this material with another member of the WMIds group. We
have discussed the material and the practical organisation of the day in a
WMids Group Meeting.
The upshot is that there was not a clear majority in favour
of an outside speaker but that there was a view that there should be at least
one speaker to get us started.
All this led us to the conclusion that we would suggest that
members of the network provide an introduction to this day.
We will be sending out flyers describing a “Community
Psychology Practice Development Day”, which people can use to help their workplaces
understand the relevance of the event.
As mentioned before, the cost will be about £20.
If people can give us an idea of their intention to come or
otherwise, that would be very helpful (so far, Gareth and Annie lead the way). These
responses may help us to reduce the cost.
You can email me directly [log in to unmask]
Reminder to anybody who has been wanting to
come but has forgotten to put it in their diary.
Get your finger out.
Prompt to the list to do some pre-debate to
lead us in to the event.
In order to arrive on the day with the best chance possible
of achieving something worthwhile a number of people suggested starting off
debate in advance. There was also support for some structure to the day.
Here is some information to get us started.
Some important themes emerged from the material people sent
in, I mention a couple of them here:
Mark had also mentioned a possible approach to the structure
of the day in one of his emails. I asked him to describe it, which he did.
Here it is:
“I didn't have a
specific model in mind but thought that as people will
be together it would be
worth actually trying to get a product from their
presence and involvement.
So a structure might involve an introductory
presentation that had the
structure of presenting key issues, and then
groups would work to fill
in a template producing a consensus statement
that could then be
circulated around the network and possibly agreed or
published.
So if for example the
overall topic was:
"Alternatives to neo-liberalisation"
A talk could briefly sketch
out what neo-liberal formulae and policies
look like, and 5 key points
of criticism.
Then the group could work
through the following:
1) How is neo-liberalisation
impacting on the following:
-vulnerable people in
- communities in
- health and welfare
systems
2) What are the current
trends, most worrying developments, in these
areas?
3) What resistance is
there to this?
- what are its strengths
and weaknesses
4) How might community and
other critical psychologists work on this?
- within psychology
- in interdisciplinary
contexts
- as citizens
This isn't meant to
prescribe what it would look like but give a kind of
worked example.
I think the Work Tables
could simply work through these - and it would
Be worth having separate
topics on different tables, probably relating to
some kind of general scene
setting. they could probably function as
leaderless groups,, but it
might be worth having a couple of floaters
who could help get groups
unstuck, watch time, etc.
I've used something like
this in other areas and it gets a lot of
valuable material from what
might otherwise just be a fell-good (or probably feel
awful!) day.”
Cheers
Carl
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This material has been checked by us for computer viruses using CA Etrust V7 and although no virus has been found by us, we cannot guarantee that it is completely free from such problems and we do not accept any liability for loss or damage which may be caused. This communication is intended solely for the addressee and is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any information, materials, graphics, and/or opinions posted by the Sender are those of the respective Sender and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust unless explicitly stated to the contrary. |