Hi Shankar, I believe it is better to use CNS make_cv_twin.inp to define the reflections related by the twin operator and then use this cv file to carry out refinement using the twin_lsq refinement target in CNS than to actually try to detwin the data and then carry out refinement with the detwinned data. I had a similar case recently (also at 2.0A) and also found better R/Rfree values on using the first approach. However, I think it is also possible that one of the above approaches may work better than the other (in terms of R/Rfree and resulting map quality after refinement) depending on the twin fraction, kind of twinning, etc. so it is better to try both as you have done. I think whichever method gives better maps and R/Rfree value should be used. However, I'm not sure why there is such a difference in R-factor values in the 2 approaches, mainly because I don't understand the details of twinning very well. Regards, Debanu. Shankar Prasad Kanaujia wrote: >Dear all, >I am refining a twinned (twinning fraction = 0.213 from Yeates' method) >data using CNS. I refined in two ways. >1. Firstly, I created the .cv file using make_cv_twin.inp from CNS and >then e.g. used minimize_twin.inp for minimization. The Rwork and Rfree >were 19.55% and 22.06% respectively. >2. In the second case, I detwinned the .cv file (.cv file created in the >first case) using detwin_partial.inp from CNS. And then e.g. used >minimize.inp for minimization (Here, I am refining as there is no >twinning). The Rwork and Rfree were 24.5% and 26.59% respectively. > >In both cases, I used the same model and without any water. The >resolution of the data is 2.0 Angs, space group R3, twinning operator >(h,-h-k,-l) > >By seeing the Rwork and Rfree, I can guess that first case is better. I >also superimposed two minimized pdb's and RMSD = 0.123 Angs. > >Now My question is which of the above two ways is the right way to refine >the model. And why there is almost 5% difference in R-factor values. > >Any suggestions or references will be highly appreciated. >Thanking you all in advance. > >-- >Yours Sincerely, >Shankar Prasad Kanaujia >IISc, Bangalore - 12 >Mobile: 9845631581 > >