 |
 |
Gosh this discussion is a keeper. The interesting thing about this list is the variety of the subscribers. The academic vs paractitioner divide has already been described as artificial, as individual roles (at least the roles individuals have held historically) often cross this boundary. It has also been suggested that there are other roles, including those working in policy, representatives of NGO's etc. Oh, and the public/s. It's a complex landscape. Perhaps our work should make the most of this terrain, and make an effort to build networks of activity that include all these roles? It's not a question of backing the winner, but collaborating well. ********************************************************************** 1. To suspend yourself from the list, whilst on leave, for example, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the following message: set psci-com nomail 2. To resume email from the list, send the following message: set psci-com mail 3. To leave psci-com, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the message: leave psci-com 4. Further information about the psci-com discussion list, including list archive, can be found at the list web site: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/psci-com.html 5. The psci-com gateway to internet resources on science communication and science and society can be found at http://psci-com.ac.uk **********************************************************************