"The Hague had handed down a binding ruling in 2002 to settle a territorial dispute in which Nigerian troops and police often clashed with their Cameroonian" The dispute as submitted by Cameroon to the court is not essentially a territorial dispute but as the name of the case on the ICJ list suggests it involved a Land and maritime dispute with territorial and boundary aspects. Indeed only a small Peninsula at the southernmost part of the territory of both states constituted a territorial dispute. The boundary relations between the two states has traditionally been impressively cordial as far as countries that share about a 1800 kilometer long boundary can go. The affected population on both sides were at relative peace and largely lived as friendly neighbours sometimes even in absolute disregard for the colonial era imposed artificial borders. The few flash points nearly all related to the territorial question over Bakassi peninsula.

That the Bakassi Peninsula is 'oil rich' is one of the greatest urban myths of the last century and survives well on the pages of the newspapers of written by half informed journalists. Nigeria, which until a few months ago had absolute control over this piece of territory has over 30 years experience in the exploitation of oil resources in its territories and is one of the top ten highest producers of hydrocarbons. It is highly unlikely that it would have an oil rich Peninsula that it has not been investigated and never exploited. The area in question is simply not 'oil rich'. At any rate the Nigerian state has always maintained that its interest in the Bakassi territory is based on its important responsibility to protect its citizens and their ancestral rights. It was always maintained that mineral rights if any was of no importance to the dispute but rather it saw its duty to continue maintaining the administration of the people and providing for their basic needs. As a consequence of this the so called Green Tree agreement which provides for the handover of Bakassi to Cameroon contains a limited period of continuing administration by Nigeria.

"The ruling was in favour of Cameroon ...".
The ruling of the ICJ was perhaps in favour of Cameroon only in respect of the Bakassi Peninsular by consequence of which Cameroon has apparently gained an estimated population of 200000 Nigerians who are apparently not happy with the judgment. Whether this is a modern day Phyrric victory is something only time can disclose. It can only be said that the judgment appears to be a pure expression of victory of formalism over ancestral connections, generational rights and the evidence of continuous administration. At any event it gives little or no respect to the common sense and sound legal principle which dates back into immemorial time and definitely found in Roman thinking that "possession is nine tenth of the law". At any rate the courts delineation of the boundary along the1800 kilometres land boundary, from Lake Chad in the north to the Sea in the South is eminently considered to have gone in favour of Nigeria's positions maintained at the Court. Thereupon there has been increases to the country's territory and this part of the Courts work has removed some long standing uncertainties along the boundary a fact which can only be in favour of both states. Perhaps most significantly if the suspicions that the Cameroonian strategy was to substantially increase its maritime territory through the Courts judgment are true then it can be demonstrated that the strategy failed spectacularly and the maritime delimitation taken on the whole also went largely in favour of Nigerian interests.

Having said all these it appears that the really good news is that two mature African sates have approached their boundary problems in the true traditions of mutual respect and in accordance with international law and they have been accomplishing their demarcation activities successfully in an impressive manner. Both countries indeed have the next millenia to look forward to in terms of mutual coexistence as neighbours in an area that by virtue of the Gulf of Guinea oil finds will represent the new Eldorado of our times.

----- Original Message -----
From: I Made Andi Arsana <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 1:21 am
Subject: [INT-BOUNDARIES] Cameroon: Nigeria Boundary Demarcation Continues Mid-February
To: [log in to unmask]

> Dear Coleagues,
>
> This news might be interesting to some of you.
> Happy reading!
>
> Cheers
> Andi
>
> Cameroon: Nigeria Boundary Demarcation Continues Mid-February
>
> The Post (Buea)
>
> January 30, 2007
> Posted to the web January 30, 2007
>
> Leocadia Bongben
>
>
> Phase 2 of the demarcation of the maritime boundary between Cameroon
> and Nigeria will begin in mid-February.
>
> This was the top-most item on the agenda of the 17th session of the
> Nigeria-Cameroon Mixed Commission meeting in Yaounde on January 24.The
> demarcation of additional 275 km of border will stretch along rivers
> and watersheds. Already, 470 km of the 1700 km borderline have already
> been demarcated.
>
>
> According to a press release issued by the UN Office for West Africa
> in Dakar on January 23, the working group made up of surveyors and
> cartographers of the two countries and the UN, after visits
> along the
> maritime boundary is to finalise the geo-referencing of the British
> Admiralty chart that formed the basis of the judgment of October 10,
> 2002 into a known datum.
>
> The report of the Mixed Commission after regular visits of the UN
> Observer Mission from 9-14 December, the release states,
> presents a
> satisfactory situation concerning the rights of the affected
> population being respected after the withdrawal and transfer of
> authority in August 2006.
>
> Meanwhile, the European Union, EU, has donated an additional 3.95
> million euros (FCFA 2,567,500,000) to support the implementation of
> the Nigeria-Cameroon boundary demarcation project.
>
> It will go toward the placement of boundary pillars and the provision
> of final maps and records substantiating the implementation of the
> demarcation.
>
> The International Court of Justice, ICJ, at The Hague had handed down
> a binding ruling in 2002 to settle a territorial dispute in which
> Nigerian troops and police often clashed with their Cameroonian
> counterparts, especially around the oil-rich Bakassi Peninsula.
>
> The ruling was in favour of Cameroon and in August 2006, Nigeria
> formally handed over the Bakassi Peninsula to Cameroon.
>
>
>
> --
> ========================
> I Made Andi Arsana
> E : [log in to unmask]
> http://madeandi.staff.ugm.ac.id/
> Yahoo, GTalk, Skype : madeandi
> ========================
>