>I think that the true infertility is
the very lack of meaningful historical experience. It’s a society of pure
meaningless hedonism. Today, ideology is no longer big causes such as socialism,
>equality, justice, democracy. The basic injunction is ‘have a good
time’ or to put it in more spiritualist terms ‘realize yourself’. This
is why I think Dalai Lama is such a big hit. He preaches >enlightened
Hollywood egotism; be happy, realize your potentials and so on and so on.
And this is our despair today. I think that this film gives the best diagnosis
of the ideological >despair of late capitalism. Of a society without
history, or, to use another political term, bio politics. And my god, this
film literally is about bio politics.
i have not seen the film, and cannot
claim to have understood -- i mean really
understood -- the zizek that i've read,
which is much of zizek . . . but . . .
so far as i can tell, this a lament
precisely about the absence of ideology, the
replacement of identity politics by
an agenda of pure ego gratification
devoid of historical anchoring .
. . so i find myself wondering: isn't it ironic
that after two generations of almost
universal lamentation about the
pernicious fall-out of ideologies, we
now suddenly find ourselves hearing
about the tragedy of a-historicity?
. . . hmmmm. . . .
in view of the fact that zizek worries
about the contemporary world being
"meaningless," maybe the central
question can be posed this way [and with
full recognition that all these words
are multiply loaded] : is meaning itself
possible without ideology??
mike
.
*
*
Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon.
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to.
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
**