Print

Print


>I think that the true infertility is the very lack of meaningful 
historical experience. It?s a society of pure meaningless hedonism. Today, 
ideology is no longer big causes such as socialism, >equality, justice, 
democracy. The basic injunction is ?have a good time? or to put it in more 
spiritualist terms ?realize yourself?. This is why I think Dalai Lama is 
such a big hit. He preaches >enlightened Hollywood egotism; be happy, 
realize your potentials and so on and so on. And this is our despair 
today. I think that this film gives the best diagnosis of the ideological 
>despair of late capitalism. Of a society without history, or, to use 
another political term, bio politics. And my god, this film literally is 
about bio politics.

i have not seen the film, and cannot claim to have understood -- i mean 
really
understood -- the zizek that i've read, which is much of zizek . . . but . 
. .

so far as i can tell, this a lament precisely about the absence of 
ideology, the
replacement of identity politics by an agenda of pure ego gratification
devoid of historical anchoring  . . . so i find myself wondering:  isn't 
it ironic 
that after two generations of almost universal lamentation about the 
pernicious fall-out of ideologies, we now suddenly find ourselves hearing
about the tragedy of a-historicity? . . . hmmmm. . . .

in view of the fact that zizek worries about the contemporary world being 
"meaningless," maybe the central question can be posed this way [and with 
full recognition that all these words are multiply loaded] :    is meaning 
itself 
possible without ideology??

mike

.

*
*
Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon.
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to.
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
**