It has been noticable to me that since FOI and the governance links for that
with some government departments that the ICO's work regarding DP has
increasingly suffered in various ways.
This should not really be a surprise when one considers demands normally
emanating from governance links measured against the more diffuse DP
customer demands. Parliament should of course counter that, but hey, MP's
are busy animals and once a structure is in place it should function as
intended.
Such errors could be viewed as merely an indicator of those issues.
Ian W
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:13:17 -0000
From: Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: New guidance from ICO - working with potentially violent
members of the public
So if at least two members of this list can find possible conditions which
are satisfied, why didn't the ICO? I agree with our contributors, but still
find the guidance disconcerting.
Paul Ticher
0116 273 8191
22 Stoughton Drive North, Leicester LE5 5UB
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
