Print

Print
TimesMore Americans than Canadians (almost half) find anti-terrorism laws Timesintrusive – Queen’s international surveillance survey finds TimesQueen’s Surveillance Project benchmarks global attitudes about being watched TimesKINGSTON, Ont. – Almost half of Canadians and even more Americans say they find Timesnew laws aimed at protecting national security post 9/11 intrusive. Times  TimesThat’s just one of the wide-ranging findings of a survey on the surveillance and privacy Timesattitudes and experiences of 9,000 people in eight countries initiated by the Queen’s TimesUniversity-based Surveillance Project. The multi-disciplinary group is studying the TimesGlobalization of Personal Data (GPD) and the surveillance associated with that flow – by Timesgovernments, employers, and via technologies like personal computers, biometrics and Timesglobal-positioning systems – on ordinary people. Times  Times“We are seeing a high level of concern in many parts of the world about the intrusiveness Timesof these post 9/11 laws. Most surprising is the strong American reaction to its new Timesnational security laws – 15 per cent said these laws were highly intrusive,” says Elia TimesZureik, lead researcher. Times  TimesThis is believed to be the first cross-cultural study of its kind that explores relationships Timesbetween attitudes and experiences, and how much people trust corporations and Timesgovernments to handle personal information, including the sharing of such information Timeswith third parties, the researcher says. Times  TimesFunded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and Timesconducted by Ipsos Reid, the survey included nearly 50 questions on participant’s Timesattitudes about issues like consumer surveillance, racial profiling at airports, national ID Timescards, media coverage of surveillance issues, workplace privacy, knowledge of privacy Timesregulations, control over personal data and public trust in government. Times  TimesTheir answers reveal a variety of cultural commonalities and differences culled from Timesparticipants in Canada, the U.S., China, France, Spain, Hungary, Mexico and Brazil. Times  TimesHighlights Times  TimesAcross the globe a majority of respondents: • Timesbelieve surveillance laws are intrusive (U.S. 57 per cent, Canada 48 per cent, TimesSpain 53 per cent, Mexico 46 per cent, Brazil 41 per cent, France 40 per cent ) • Timesworry about providing personal information on websites (China 54 per cent, TimesCanada 66 per cent, Brazil 70 per cent, Spain 62 per cent and U.S. 60 per cent). • Timesbelieve the use of closed circuit television deters in-store crime (Mexico 88 per Timescent, U.S. 80 per cent, Canada 79 per cent, France 73 per cent). • Timesrejected out-right the premise that airport authorities should give extra security Timeschecks to visible minority passengers. About 60 per cent of Chinese, Hungarians, TimesBrazilians, and Canadians but only a third of Americans found such practices Timesunacceptable. Times  TimesCulturally distinctive survey findings include: • Times63 per cent of Chinese respondents trust the government to protect the personal Timesinformation it collects compared to just 48 per cent of Canadians and a mere 20 Timesper cent of Brazilians say they trust their respective governments with their Timespersonal information. • TimesThe majority of respondents do not believe that they have much say in what Timeshappens to their personal information. Only roughly 30 per cent of Canadians, TimesAmericans, Spaniards and Hungarians believe they have complete or a lot of say. TimesChinese and French respondents felt they had the most say at 67 and 60 per cent, Timescompared with Mexicans 40 per cent and Brazilians 34 per cent. • TimesEighty-two percent of Canadians and 80 percent of Americans report themselves Timesas being knowledgeable about the Internet compared to just 35 percent of TimesMexicans and 33 percent of Brazilian respondents. Times  Times“We have learned that there is an urgent need to educate the public about the Timescomplexities of the information age, to demand organizational and governmental Timesaccountability with regard to handling personal data, and to develop appropriate theory to Timesexplain and predict flows of personal data and to connect this with privacy ethics and Timesgovernment policy,” Dr. Zureik says. Times  TimesA team of international surveillance experts will meet at Queen’s later this week to Timesfurther study the data collected by survey. Times  TimesFor more information on the Surveillance Project, an executive summary of the GPD Timessurvey findings or pdf version of the survey’s Ipsos Reid report, go to: Times0000,0000,FFFFhttp://www.queensu.ca/sociology/Surveillance/ Times  TimesTo learn more about Research at Queen's 0000,0000,FFFFhttp://www.queensu.ca/research/ Times  TimesContact: TimesSarah Withrow, 613-533-3280, [log in to unmask] TimesLorinda Peterson, 613-533-3234, [log in to unmask] TimesAttention broadcasters: Queen's now has facilities to provide broadcast quality audio Timesand video feeds. For television interviews, we can provide a live, real-time double ender Timesfrom Kingston fibre optic cable and broadcast quality radio transmissions from our on campus Timesstudio. Please call for details. Arial  Arial0000,0000,8080Joan Sharpe Arial0000,0000,8080Project Manager, The Surveillance Project Arial0000,0000,8080c/o Department of Sociology Arial0000,0000,8080Queen's University Arial0000,0000,8080Kingston, ON K7L 3N6 Arial0000,0000,8080(613) 533-6000, ext. 78867 Arial0000,0000,8080(613) 533-6499 FAX Arial0000,0000,FFFFhttp://www.queensu.ca/sociology/Surveillance  Times New Roman  Times New Roman  Times New Roman