Print

Print


Ralph Adam wrote:

>
> Unfortunately, 'was' should have read 'is'!
>
> I was in a Kent library on Saturday and that's exactly what happened - 
> but the 'readers' objected loudly claiming they still had time left on 
> their PCs. They refused to knuckle-down shouting that they expected 
> higher-quality service from librarians!
>
And while we as devoted servants of the public can't mention such sordid 
things - of course the Kent staff were a) professional librarians and b) 
paid for the time they spend securing the premises after closing time.

Of course they were.

-- 
David Allen
London