 |
 |
> In your case we think that in fact you only have one experiment, with two > spectra in it, not two experiments each with one spectrum. So renaming > the experiment of one spectrum will automatically rename the experiment of > the second spectrum since they are one and the same. Indeed. The philosophy in Analysis is currently to discourage having experiments with the same name, for reasons of clarity, even though this is allowed in the data model. If you load a new spectrum and it is associated with an existing experiment's name, then it is assumed that it belongs to that experiment. It was just easier to have one name entry box, rather than a pulldown of existing experiments and a separate name dialog if you wanted to specify a new name (which is almost always true). A confirmation dialog if two spectra are going into one experiment is appropriate though, and I have added this. Update to get the fix. T. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr Tim Stevens Email: [log in to unmask] Department of Biochemistry [log in to unmask] University of Cambridge Phone: +44 1223 766018 (office) 80 Tennis Court Road +44 7816 338275 (mobile) Old Addenbrooke's Site +44 1223 364613 (home) Cambridge CB2 1GA WWWeb: http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/~tjs23 United Kingdom http://www.pantonia.co.uk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ +NH3CH(CH(CH3)OH)C(O)NHCH(CH(CH3)CH2CH3)C(O)NHCH(CH2CH2SCH3)CO2- ------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------