Print

Print
Message
Am I missing something here, but on every Jisc mail posting and subsequent responses the originators email address appears on it, so should you feel it necessary to collaborate privately you can do so without posting directly to Jisc!!!
 
The initial question could invoke a response from someone outside a specific sector that has experience of  a specific legislation or best practice model that originators sector is now subject to adhere to.
 
You often see as a response  in "xxx sector  we take the view---" 
 
Can't see the need for a specific forum, but then I'm only from the IT Sector. The openness of this forum provides us with an insight to what information hurdles you guys need to address and inspires us to think about new ways to apply technology to deal with it. The current dilemma for many of those who have invested in EDRMS is how the devil we get people to use it, as let's face it many systems are not liked at the user level leading to low levels of adoption, resulting in  the investment missing it's strategic outcome by a country mile.
 
We have a strategy to address this so if you wish to discuss privately to avoid the stigma of having a struggling EDRMS then please feel free to email me privately.
 
Regards to you all and grateful for your contribution. Much of it sadly ignored as it's mainly policy based discussions that technology struggles to formulate an answer to.
 
Paul Headey
Deltascheme Ltd

From: The UK Records Management mailing list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tinsley, Chris
Sent: 04 October 2006 11:02
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Records Management' online forum on esd-forum for .gov.uk

I’ve got no problem with idea bouncing, I have gained much information from the HE/FE members of the group and hope I have been able help them on occasion.  The smaller groups however tend to become insular and lose sight of the bigger picture.  I have a normal public servant distrust of consultancy but will freely admit that the contribution of Eldin and his ilk has been a great help in making me see the larger picture.

Chris Tinsley MSc

Wiltshire County Council

01225 713644

Information is the key

From: The UK Records Management mailing list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Matthew Stephenson
Sent: 04 October 2006 09:49
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Records Management' online forum on esd-forum for .gov.uk

Dear Chris,

You can infer all you like but when you are a one-man-FoI officer, being able to bounce ideas off other professionals can be very helpful.

You may consider the closed list to be a bad idea but most members of the HE/FE list find it to be of value, especially those who are not records managers, FoI or DP officers but find that they have been given the responsibility for RM, FoI or DOP anyway.  Many of their emails begin "sorry for what must seem a stupid question but ".  I get the impression that they are more able to do this on a smaller list.

Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: Tinsley, Chris [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 04 October 2006 09:39
To: Stephenson Matthew; [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: Records Management' online forum on esd-forum for .gov.uk

So effectively a closed list is useful when similar types of institutions wish to collude in denying people information.

I realise this is probably not the intention but it certainly can be inferred. 

I always read with interest discussions which do not or will not touch on my sector, it keeps the brain keen.  I think the closed list would be a bad idea.

Chris Tinsley MSc

Wiltshire County Council

Information is the key

From: The UK Records Management mailing list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Matthew Stephenson
Sent: 04 October 2006 09:30
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Records Management' online forum on esd-forum for .gov.uk

Dear Eldin,

A very good example is when a journalist sends round a FoI request to a large number of institutions.  One University will say "we got this request, who else has" and for the next couple of days you'll have dozens of institutions saying "yeah we've got it" or "no we haven't go it, what's it about".  I can't imagine that this is of any interest to other sectors.

The next stage of that is when different institutions then discuss how they will deal with the request and I for one would not be prepared to comment on an open list the different options that could be used and how I feel about each one when the resuester could be reading my emails.  Having a closed list enables one to be much more honest and open about things like that.

Regards

Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: The UK Records Management mailing list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Eldin Rammell, Rammell Consulting
Sent: 03 October 2006 14:39
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Records Management' online forum on esd-forum for .gov.uk

Matt,

I don’t know if this is possible, but could you provide a couple of examples of issues that you think are more appropriate for a closed list? The beauty of a medium like email is that if a topic comes up that is of no interest, I hit the delete key. Simple. The danger is that folk on a closed may THINK their topic is of no interest but I’ve been surprised at how much I’ve learned since joining this list about areas that I’ve not previously had experience of. I view participation on this list as an important part of my on-the-job education and would certainly miss the input from Government circles.

Regards,

Eldin.

From: The UK Records Management mailing list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Matthew Stephenson
Sent: 03 October 2006 12:42
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Records Management' online forum on esd-forum for .gov.uk

Peter,

I agree with what you have said entirely but I would say that having a smaller closed list for the HE/FE community provides us with a forum for people to say things that they would not necessarily do on an open list and prevents others from having to observe boring sector-specific conversations.

I think that there's space for sectoral closed lists and a large all encompassing open list for everyone depending on the matter being discussed.

Regards

Matt

Matthew Stephenson

Records Manager

Information Services Division

University of Salford

The Crescent

Salford M5 4WT

Tel: 0161 295 3152

Fax: 0161 295 6339

Email: [log in to unmask]

Web: www.isd.salford.ac.uk/governance

-----Original Message-----
From: The UK Records Management mailing list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Peter Emmerson
Sent: 03 October 2006 12:06
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Records Management' online forum on esd-forum for .gov.uk

Although this list is hosted by JISCMAIL it is not an HE/FE list but one aimed at all records managers.  A quick glance at the messages sent to the list over the past week or so indicates that about 90 per cent of contributors are, perhaps not surprisingly, in local government.  The HE/FE records managers have already set up a separate, closed list limited to people with a .ac.uk address.

Is this a need for exclusivity a peculiarly British phenomenon?  The US and Australian RM lists have remained very open and people from a very wide range of organisations, backgrounds and experience contribute to them.  The problem with closed lists is that they exclude insights from people working in other environments who might have a useful contribution to make to the problems you face. Records managers in the UK are not such a large group that they need to continually split into ever smaller employment based groups.  Employment simply defines the environment in which you work.  It doesn’t affect basic professional principles which are pretty well universal.

Peter Emmerson
Director
Emmerson Consulting Limited
Poplar House
5 School Street
Witton-Le-Wear
County Durham  DL14 0AS
Office          01388 488865
Mobile          07740 942682
This e-mail message is confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of it is prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system.

Emmerson Consulting Limited is registered in England No. 3607347. 
Registered Office: 140 Coniscliffe Road, Darlington, County Durham, DL3 7RT

**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and

intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they

are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify

the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com

**********************************************************************

Please do not print out this e-mail unless absolutely necessary. Save energy and paper!




This message has been scanned for viruses by MailController.

Click here to report this email as spam.