Print

Print


Recently I've seen  ~200  lhcbsgm  and also  some  ~30 atlassgm  


here is the data from maui   ( 200616  is this year week 16  etc) 

maui_userstats.200616:lhcbsgm    123   123   6824.59   32   0.81 1578.0   0.17 
2252.6   2.97 -----   0.15   0.00   3.29  95.42  10.56
maui_userstats.200617:lhcbsgm     13    13    507.58  905  13.01 64320.0   
4.36 14294.3  17.32 -----   0.34   0.00   2.31  97.22  30.92
maui_userstats.200618:lhcbsgm     16    16    207.46  407   5.92 27990.0   
2.93 9153.4  15.13 -----   0.32   0.00   1.87  94.98  29.10
maui_userstats.200619:lhcbsgm     18    18    506.76   64   1.55 3882.0   0.28 
1621.9   1.83 -----   0.36   0.00   0.48  93.51  35.17
maui_userstats.200620:lhcbsgm      0     0      0.00   23   0.52 1656.0   0.28  
428.1   0.34 -----   0.72   0.00   2.02  85.35  69.11

and for atlas:

maui_userstats.200619:atlassgm     0     0      0.00   93   2.26 6630.0   0.48 
1058.8   1.19 -----   0.18   0.00   1.48  45.08  16.43
maui_userstats.200620:atlassgm    28    39   2153.94   77   1.74 5688.0   0.98 
1049.1   0.84 -----   0.24   0.00  12.19  61.52   7.12
maui_userstats.200652:atlassgm     3     3      0.00 ---- ------ ------ ------  
504.0   2.62 ----- ------ ------ ------ 100.00 ------




On Tuesday 23 May 2006 17:34, you wrote:
> Gordon, JC (John) wrote:
> > Olivier, I am sitting next to Nick Brook and he says that lhcb
> > production jobs should not run as sgm. Is this happening at other sites?
>
> When checking the gridmapfile I can find only 3 sgm users.
> Alex could you tell us when you saw a lot of lhcb sgm jobs ? When I look
> now i only see normal lhcb
>
>
> Olivier.
>
> > Can you tell me the DN of the user being mapped to sgm, if that doesn't
> > break your data security policy:-) Nick thinks the gridmapfile
> > generation may not be correct.
> >
> > John
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes
> >> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Olivier van der Aa
> >> Sent: 23 May 2006 15:49
> >> To: [log in to unmask]
> >> Subject: shared experiment area load
> >>
> >> Dear All,
> >>
> >> At QMUL we have a load problem with the experimental shared area.
> >> The farm is running around 900 jobs and the nfs server serving the
> >> experimental area is overloaded.
> >>
> >> The result of that is that lhcb jobs sits for a long time on the wn
> >> waiting for data (mainly libraries).
> >>
> >> We would like to know how this is solved at ral, manchester where the
> >> size is similar. We where thinking of setting up a set of pbs
> >> slots for
> >> the sgm to have rw access. The other nodes would just have a
> >> copy on the
> >> local disk or access through several nfs servers.
> >>
> >> I think the problem with the small set of wn having rw access is that
> >> lhcb is sending a lot of jobs via one user who is sgm. Most of those
> >> jobs do not write to the experimental software area but they
> >> would stack
> >> to wait for the wn to be freed.
> >>
> >> We are keen to have your experience on that topic.
> >>
> >> Cheers, Olivier.
> >>
> >> --
> >> - O. van der Aa - Imperial College London -
> >> -       LT2 Technical Coordinator         -
> >> - tel: +442075947810, +442071005426       -
> >> - SIP: [log in to unmask]              -
> >> - fax: +442078238830                      -
> >> - http://surl.se/agtu                     -

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            |
|  Dr. Alex Martin                                                           |
|  e-Mail:   [log in to unmask]        Queen Mary, University of London,  |
|  Phone :   +44-(0)20-7882-5033          Mile End Road,                     |
|  Fax   :   +44-(0)20-8981-9465          London, UK   E1 4NS                |
|                                                                            |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------