 |
 |
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Norman Gray wrote: >> the starlink list has been very very quiet, so that looks about right to me >> (the others, stardev and starlink-internal seem suitably populated). What >> were you looking for? > > Ach, you're right. > > I forgot there was the starlink@jiscmail list _and_ the stardev@jiscmail > list, and it's the latter (ie, this one) I should have directed Grant > towards. OK, that clears it up. > In my defence, it's the starlink@jiscmail list that the Starlink > front page <http://www.starlink.ac.uk> points towards, so it might be good to > change that, and possibly remove the starlink@jiscmail list, since it's > clearly almost completely unused. It is very quiet, but seems have a few subscribers so I doubt it's worth the effort of unsettling them. What we need is an actual announcement to make on it. That may happen over the next few weeks with a new release that we're planning. Cheers, Peter.