 |
 |
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 12:22:41PM +0100, Pete Johnston wrote: > I confess I'm still a little bit hazey about whether/when we need to say > "RDF URI reference" rather than "URI", but given that RDF Concepts uses > the first form, I guess it's fine to stick with that when talking about > things in the RDF graph. According to Dan Connolly in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2005Mar/0006.html: > re "2.1. Identify Terms with URI References." > -- http://esw.w3.org/topic/VocabManagementNote > > The right term there URI. We identify with URIs. > > URI references are things used in data formats to abbreviate (or spell > out in full) URIs. > > The historical problem where the term "URI" didn't include things with > #fragments > is now fixed in > > URI > IETF STD 66, RFC 3986: Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): > Generic Syntax, T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, L. Masinter, > January 2005. Available at <http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt>. > > see http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#uri-refs Tom -- Dr. Thomas Baker [log in to unmask] Director, Specifications and Documentation Dublin Core Metadata Initiative