Print

Print


Where do we go? Social science approaches to understanding the European 
Union

Symposium at Klagenfurt University, Austria
29.9. - 30.9.2006

Objectives/Mission of the Symposium

No sooner did the Soviet block implode in the late eighties of the 20th 
century than a new supranational political structure began to emerge in 
Europe - the European Union (EU). Based on more than forty years of mainly 
economic cooperation in the framework of the European Economic Community 
(EEC) and to a lesser extent in the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) 
new treaties (Maastricht, Amsterdam) were hammered out to level the road to 
a European Union. In the meantime this structure is more or less in place 
and has taken over most of the policy issues of its Member States. At the 
same time it has left its subjects as well as observers puzzled about its 
very identity. The broader European public is only slowly becoming aware of 
the severe consequences of this new political reality. However, more 
awareness seems to lead rather to more confusion than to a better 
understanding. In the middle of the first decade of the 21st century it 
doesn’t appear to be an exaggeration to claim that the future of this 
Grande Project is more uncertain than ever and increasingly contested. 

One of the major uncertainties derives from a lack of insight into the long 
term consequences of the supra national structures and policies emerging 
more or less unreflected by the national electorate and decision makers. Of 
course, this does not mean that there is no scientific monitoring of the 
process. Not at all, there seems to be no lack of research on the EU. A 
lively interdisciplinary scientific field called “European Union Studies” 
has emerged in the last decade. However, the results of this research 
rarely add up to gain a broader picture of the historical character and 
direction of the EU. Besides that “integration” is often taken as granted. 
Here it is worth to remember the fate of the Soviet Union. Despite 
establishments like “Soviet Studies” the death of the system came as a 
surprise.  This should tell us something about the need to keep in mind 
and/or to refine theoretical approaches with a macro-societal perspective. 

It is the main objective of the symposium to investigate and discuss how 
different social science paradigms provide instruments to better understand 
the character of the European Union as such (macro perspective) and thus 
the direction of its possible evolution. So far this task has mainly been 
taken on by representatives of globalization theory (Albrow), network 
theory (Castells) and ideological visionaries (Rifkin). These approaches 
have in common that they basically all point the EU in the same direction. 
Although the symposium will discuss these conventional approaches as well, 
we particularly invite scholars who draw their ideas about the EU from 
other paradigms (e.g. post-structuralists, post-Marxists). Whereas the main 
objective is to fathom out the capacity of different social theories for 
understanding the EU, to present speculative ad hoc scenarios and empirical 
research about the future of the EU will also be possible, not least in 
order to stimulate the theoretical discussions.

Deadline for abstracts: 31.5.2006. Abstracts to be submitted to 
[log in to unmask] 

Symposium fees:
Participants: € 100.-
Registered Speakers: no fee

Accommodation and other inquiries may be directed to 
[log in to unmask]