 |
 |
Co Prox supposed to enhance the effect of warfarin. -----Original Message----- From: Rowley Cottingham [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: 06 March 2006 20:58 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: The power of television. Do you mean he was taking co-proxamol and co-dydramol simultaneously, or are you concerned about some interaction with Warfarin? I'm a bit baffled. Best wishes Rowley. -----Original Message----- From: Accident and Emergency Academic List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Graham, Keith Sent: 06 March 2006 13:27 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: The power of television. Although I do agree with you all in general, we did have a chap who asked us if he should be taking Co-proxamol whilst on Warfarin? The reason he asked - why of course it was on Casualty the previous Saturday. He hadnt told anyone about using Co-proxamol when he was diagnosed with a DVT, as he had been "finishing off" the Co-codamol he was given post Total Hip Replacement three weeks earlier. Keith Graham Physiotherpist Practitioner Minor Injuries Clinic Edinburgh -----Original Message----- From: Accident and Emergency Academic List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Helen Deborah Vecht Sent: 03 March 2006 10:00 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: The power of television. Adrian Fogarty <[log in to unmask]>typed > I give up when it comes to television today. > Very tempted to stop my licence > again. Mind you, when I went without a licence a few years ago, for about a > year, I couldn't believe the amount of "abuse" I got from the licensing > authorities, who basically assumed that I had to be watching television > illegally, as if it was "unthinkable" that one could survive without > watching television. It was this assumption that really bothered me, > as if I > was "guilty until proved innocent" rather than the other way round. > Eventually I gave in to the continual nagging and just got a licence again! > I email the beeb all the time - as you might imagine - about all sorts > of > wrongdoings. Mind you, they are quite responsive to most of my criticisms! I am TV-free, as are most of my sibs (many of whom inhabit Adrian's catchment area) I was harrassed by the TV licencing people for years, but they stopped bothering me after their inspector visited. (It helps to stay in one place; the harrassment was horrible as an itinerant junior doctor.) Part of letter I sent to TV licencing people follows... ---------------------- Thank you for your letter of 27 October 1997. I do not have a television. I do not want a television. I do not need a television licence. I wish to have my right to lead a television-free lifestyle respected without harassment from your bureaucracy. For your information, I also do not have a car, but nobody pesters me as to why I have no licence for a non-existent possession. I am not aware that is an offence to fail to have a colour television, - yet! Those of us who choose to live without television cannot live in peace. Even if I declare that I do not have a television, your Enquiry Officers are still permitted to trouble me. I see no reason why I should tell you my name. The Occupier. ----------------------------------------------- Yes, I have been on 'You & Yours' about this very subject! -- Helen D. Vecht: [log in to unmask] Edgware. ***************************************************************** The information contained in this message may be confidential or legally privileged and is intended for the addressee only, If you have received this message in error or there are any problems, please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. *****************************************************************