 |
 |
Ah....Thanks Craig, I'm off to bed then? You are right, I went the search engine route, I did not think about the domain name. Anthony -----Original Message----- From: Therapeutic Communities [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Craig Fees Sent: 13 February 2006 17:29 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: I Can't, We Can Just to make sure no one loses any sleep over this (as if), I think the answer is straightforward: - www.icwc.org as a domain name is still available; that is, no one has bought it, and if you try to call it up in your browser, you'll find nothing happens. - However, if you enter "www.icwc.org" into a search engine, you will get a number of therapey/therapist directory/referral sites: Obviously, "I Can't We Can" used to have www.icwc.org and have let it lapse, or else someone gave out the wrong URL in a publicity push and it has never been corrected, or else a lot of people out there think that "I Can't We Can" SHOULD have the URL icwc.org, but they don't. But it is an interesting organization doing some interesting stuff. Craig In an email dated Mon, 13 2 2006 2:57:09 pm GMT, Anthony Slater <[log in to unmask]> writes: >This is a bit interesting, as the visual web pages which I looked at >displayed two very different formats and so forth. The one which I got to >was typical US treatment provision (not necessarily the therapeutic >community) and the other was clearly rooted in the "spiritual" type, as >either you or Rowdy noted. > >Curious, I think as an individual (not on behalf of EFTC) I'll give this a >miss. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Therapeutic Communities >[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Craig Fees >Sent: 13 February 2006 14:26 >To: [log in to unmask] >Subject: Re: I Can't, We Can > >I can't get icwc.org to respond, but ICWC is the accepted abbreviation for >"I Can We Can't", and I think there's only one organization. The Office >address is as you gave it, but there are faciltiies elsewhere as well (like >Community Housing and Therapy here in England, with main office, and then >individual facilities). I think there's only the one. > >Craig >